My paper on Chaos Theory, whist only written around the basic definition provided by Wikipedia is insightful and shows genuine physical/actual benefits to the economics of New Sparta and “The Spartan Theory”

A long time before “Chaos Theory” was considered, “String Theory” was considered, all be it, from a different reference point. Wikipedia was consulted but it was a quote from Isaac Asimov's Foundation Series that caught my interest.

Ref: Asimov’s ''Psychohistory'' from Harry Seldon of the ''Foundation Series''. Re: You may not predict what an individual may do, but you can put in motion, things that will move the masses in a direction that is desired, thus shaping if not predicting the future.

Is this “String Theory” and if it is, is it out of date? And if it is, is it even possible for a Theory that has not been discredited to be out of date?

One thing is for certain, a lot of particle physicist’s studying “String Theory” will be looking at far more advanced version’s 60 years on.

This said it was largely this definition of “String Theory” written to me by Anthony Rauba in answer to my question “Would mathematics in whatever form predicting future events partially validate the theory?” That lead me to believe “The Spartan Theory” was possible (or more possible), and more to the point it was possible for me to do it unaided.

I choose to put in motion, things that will move the masses in a direction that is desired, thus shaping if not predicting the future.

If this is not credibly recognised as “String Theory” its certainly the ideology that kept me going and inspired my paper “Spiritually Inspired Software” (SIS) and the simple quote ““It’s not just about the code, as important, is what we wish the software to achieve“ Which is a fundamental part of the foundations and philosophy of the project.

Further Reading

http://www.s-world.biz/FaceBook/Galactica_2017_Initial_consideration_off_String_Theory.htm

http://www.s-world.biz/FaceBook/Spiritually_Inspired_Software_SIS.htm

It’s claimed that String Theory is a genuine contender for “The Theory of Everything” All be it seems to me, that “Chaos Theory” or at least my interpretation is also a contender. And if that’s so why not “The Spartan Theory”

Back in April I wrote an amusing but logical paper “The evolution of “The Theory of Everything” not claiming that “The Spartan Theory” was “The Theory of Everything” rather “The Theory of, just a little bit more than we know now” and as an economic theory and a way to improve science and so ecology, it is. I’d go as far as to say I believe the current “Spartan Theory” is now. “The Theory of more than we know now”.

Recently the strings of one business or advance’s success increasing the success of all related business’s as described in “Chaos Theory” seems infinite, a never ending spiral of betterment of mankind.

So why not throw in both “Chaos Theory” and “The Spartan Theory” as other genuine contenders to “The Theory of Everything” arguably the particles of physics within God.