Dear Dumani
31st October 2010

Hi Dumani, 31st October 2010

Ok attached we have: “EEE – The Economy for the next 14 Billion years”

http://www.s-world.biz/Sparta_Rises_Again/index.html

The latter half of which was completed last week, paying particular attention to your email and a paper by “Lee Chazen’s” the scientist that wrote the paper. Chaos Theory, Self Organization and the Role of Government, (attached) which I looked up, due to your paper.

I expect Lee Chazen’s to acknowledge my work as credible from a “Chaos Theory” perspective, if so I’d ask him to contact, Lisi Garret, John Nash & Benoît Mandelbrot.

With the idea of a City of Science on the agenda, none will argue, it’s a worthy goal.

I’ll be preparing my letter to Lee, this evening.

I’ve also attached replies I made to both your emails last weekend.

I’d just like to touch on one point, and this is your theory.

Through a process of trying to prove the collective consciousness of the universe, I came up with this TOE/∞ -16 = 16 PPG

My premise being, it is my opinion that there is not one all concurring theory for the mysteries of the Universe, rather all positive (with good intention) combine together to make perfection.

The very name “The Theory of Everything” suggests an all concurring theory, and there are arguments about weather it is String theory, M theory, or loop quantum gravity.

The way I see it is simpler, and excuse me throwing in a few Albert Einstein quotes, I only found them yesterday.

1. If you can't explain something simply, you don't know enough about it.

2. You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother

3. It should be possible to explain the laws of physics to a barmaid

Simple is good,

Sometimes I consider the words, not necessarily just the mathematics. As such within the words “The Theory of everything”, I believe all theories are relevant, and the more you combine in a positive way, the closer we get to “The Theory of Everything” however if we consider positive theories by their very name are productive, I have considered that they double each time, they work together 1+1 is equal to double the sum of its parts, and it gives us a model like this

So with 16 positive theories we are 32,768 parts closer to “The Theory of Everything” hence TOE/8 -32768 = 32768 PPG

The Theory of Everything being so apparently infinite, needs to be divided by infinity, but if we have 16 positive theories working intrinsically together we are far closer to “The Theory of Everything”

If we have a look at my first tong in cheek paper on “The Theory of Everything” http://www.s-world.biz/FaceBook/The_Theory_of_Everything.htm

And you can see the two match, in a way, Starting with just: “String Theory” at first I had simply TOE/∞ -2 = 2 PPG and so, “The theory of just a little more than we know now” now with “The Spartan Theory” “The Theory of Evolution” & “Chaos Theory” I’m at TOE/∞ - 8 = 8 PPG

This is now “The Theory of more than we know now”

With your theory and others, we get closer and closer to the seemingly once unimaginably distant “The Theory of Everything” and so to the last part of the equation, PPG, this stands for “The partials of physics within God” or Good for now, as Good can be calculated, in the most rudimentary way, “How many good deeds has one done, in a day,”

This is however for a later paper, where I will try to show the world that if we as a collective consciousness, all do good, every good action, is the same as a good theory and the PPG number will grow to close to infinity, if everyone was to be good, we would reach “The Theory of Everything” and something surprising will happen.

This led me to “The Butterfly Effect” and to the realization that my work was actually mainly based on “Chaos Theory”

My point is, don’t give up on your theory, if you think you can change the world “Change it” “String Theory” will back you up, see possibly my favorite paper

http://www.s-world.biz/FaceBook/Spiritually_Inspired_Software_SIS.htm

This is what made me realize, not only is it possible to change things, its actually scientific destiny.

I hope that helps you understand a bit more about the inside of the theory.

I’ll be sending you the paper for Lee Chazen’s tomorrow.

This said I’m also working on the Micro EEE version, Experience Africa, so that may come first.

Good Hunting
Nick Ray