5.30 pm GMT - Thursday January 19th 2012
I’m a lot calmer, which is nice; I’ve decided not to go back
to Cape Town, which was the thing I dreaded most. Oliver, Mike and I are
going to work towards hiring a few Villas in Ko Samui in May, this is
an acceptable future, my job will simply be to socialize and impress those
that need to be impressed. It will be like starting Cape Villas all over
again, but in the country I always wished to work in. I can be happy doing
this, as will Oliver and Mike.
Having this kind of backup plan takes the pressure of, as does having
two extra months to not only complete my work on the Global economy but
equally get some travel companies interested in what we are doing.
I’ve swopped computers, my love, my friend “e-machines D620”
is not well, I need to give my new Dell a name, hmmm. As he/she will be
the one to complete “American Butterfly” there can only be
one name: “God”.
I’ve loaded up Football Manager 2005 on D620 and have them both
running, this was an exercise I did on the winter of 2004, when I needed
to work my ass off and be isolated from the world.
“American Butterfly” introduction is going so well it has
now become “American Butterfly” the website just supporting
data, I have created it without the customary links, we’re at about
25 pages at the moment, I’ve just finished the Tax section of the
final part (where I restore profit). However I’m reading and amending
from the start, I got to the part that whizzes over POP and it needs more,
a nice graphic, one page long and a few paragraphs of text. To kill 2
birds with one stone, I will tailor it to a pharmaceutical company. We
will use Johnson & Johnson as we are about to contact their CEO Mary
I’m going to write down some ideas then make a professional piece
to put on the website.
Johnson & Johnson is an annoyingly long name; we will need to shorten
it to either Johnson or JJ – JJE can work for now “Johnson
and Johnson Ecology.
I’ve been giving this some thought on my last walk, the first consideration
is weather they should incorporate or start a new company.
There is an awful lot of variables, and we are entering the world off
“applied’ not “pure”, as such whatever I come
up with will be able to be improved by the academics.
My first consideration is this, as share options are extremely limited,
the only way to create new companies is via POP, add to this we will be
limiting the amount of companies allowed within individual industries,
example “only 4 maybe 8 within travel” it may well be better
off for JJE to incorporate JJE within EEE, as such with $12.3B in profit
they will create $6.25B for new companies in the first year, and accelerated
growth from then on.
I can see the start of EEE being similar to a land grab, everyone desperate
to grab new “franchises”. Example in travel, first wave we
have the big companies, JJE will partner with a consortium of big travel
companies. All will immediately start looking to recruit reps and agents
(see facebook travel)
JJE will be immediately popular as it will make certain patent concessions,
drugs that can really help impoverished nations that can’t afford
them anyway, and a few token offerings to the USA Gov. A deal will be
struck, where as soon as JJE is making more profit and dividends than
JJ, they will make most of their pharmaceuticals open source, as such
if you book with JJE Travel you will be saving the world.
Add this to the other half of the consortium, being experienced travel
companies and tour operators, JJE Travel will have great demand. JJE Travel
has no costs unless they feel they should advertise. JJE Travel has the
clients, the new fb (we will call them that for now) fb reps and agents
deal with the clients and look after them. All is run via the system.
It would be good to only accept travel companies that incorporate, what
we mean by incorporate is, their entire company as it stands becomes a
part of the new EEE Company (Block) the exact method will vary, they will
still have to pay the entrance fee, this can be raided by a loan, or maybe
they already have the money, this needs some thought.
A point that needs to be stressed is the first companies will be the strongest
as they have first pick of EEE partners and fb reps and agents alike.
The majority of the first wave of the reps will be from the travel industry,
people already working solo or in small groups that will be overjoyed
by the new technology and additional client base. This first set will
be the most experienced and as such are more likely to excel.
How long it will take after the USA has “kicked off” before
Europe and the rest of the world follows, is a difficult question to answer.
In the facebook travel example we looked at $70 Billion by 2017, +/-23%
market share. This however only takes into example one company, if we
have 4 companies in the USA that’s $16B if we have 8 its $32B, $32B
is a lot for one country to sustain. Let’s consider how many different
companies will be created in the first round 64x4= 256 different franchises.
/8= 32. If we limit USA to 8 travel franchises we are not being restrictive.
We need to consider, the make up 50% JJE 50% Large Travel companies, or
50% JJE 25% large Travel Agencies and 25% SME’s. This route would
see the first order of business being recruiting the 25% of SME’s
The question is, how long will it take to make over $4B profit, if it
takes over 2 years by the time they are ready to create a second franchise,
a lot of other countries may have already done so, where as if JJ was
incorporated, with over $6B a year if each company (franchise) they co
founded was done on a 25% ownership basis, they would be off to a flying
start. For now however I think it best if we look at the investment model
Our target is to make sure JJE makes as much profit and dividends as it
does currently. Profit last year was $12.3 Billion.
We need to do this as quickly as possible as for pharmaceutical companies
this un-chaotic economic formula will be quite the opposite.
Not only do we have to consider, the new drugs made my EEE companies that
are free, we also have to consider the drugs that the existing pharmaceutical
companies make open source as a part of the deal. For instance if another
drug company has say, a drug for arthritis which is as effective as one
the JJ makes, but as its not been marketed as well, it makes little profit,
as such said “other drug company” may well give up the formula.
This would result in an equally good drug (or nearly) being available
for free, and it does not matter how well JJ market and advertises their
existing drug, no one is going to buy it, if they can get an alternate
Hmm, this is going to cause quite a mess, it’s a good mess for the
citizens of earth but not for the pharmaceutical companies. I think we
need to make a strong regulatory body to make sure there is some resemblance
of order and consider a timeline. I think we also need to consider some
“Give Half Back” assistance for any company that is in trouble.
Unless of course they don’t wish to help the earth, then…..
but that simply will not happen, as soon as one has signed up, there will
be a run on shares of all the others, it may take less than a day after
JJE or whoever is first for the rest to make a “Agreement in principal”
Ok, so how are we going to make JJE and friends successful, the big advantage
they all have is PR, and the will of the public to buy associated products
knowing the more they buy the more formulas etc they will make open source.
One thing to note here is the patent problem, I do not know this for certain,
my source a comment on Boston Legal but it makes sense.
It conserved HIV drugs, it seems one can take out a patent of certain
research, thus blocking others from using their method, is it possible
that there are 20 or so companies trying to find a cure, all of whom can’t
use each other’s work, as such, none can make an effective cure
as one would need all parts of the jigsaw to complete the puzzle?
I think we will find, without the patents, with work being open source,
not only will the drugs be free they will be better.
First we need to consider the investment, how much will we allow them
to invest, with banks only being allowed to invest 1$ for every $40,000
that they have, we are not looking for money, rather our intent is to
give them the opportunity to stay as profitable as they are now.
I have considered them investing double their profit yield, but for JJ
we will work on $16 Billion
How to split this, 50% USA 50% Europe, we will only concern ourselves
with the USA so $8B, let’s consider 4 50%
am GMT - Friday January 20th 2012
Having started to make the graphic and sleeping on the problem, I have
come up with a rather clever idea.
Instead of having 4 separate companies, connect them all into one, conglomerate,
so as all four feed each other until all four are full, ($16B) then expand,
no dividends or Give Half Back until full.
As such we can add the loss leader energy, plus we can include property
development to Real Estate
Realty & Development
The excellent part of this story is that in time businessbook will make
all four unbreakable.
We could also consider, loaning money to JJE, each year so as to top up
its profits, i.e
We guarantee JJE
2013 – 4 Billion
2014 – 6 Billion
2015 – 8 Billion
2016 – 10 Billion
for a 4 year plan of patent releases, then as soon as JJE is independently
making +$12B in dividends we will recoup the money.
Note: we need to work out exactly what the current JJE dividend payout
is, it says its 3.5% at the moment, which I presume is 3.5% of its share
value, it does not tell me total payout. It is mentioned that they are
buying up a lot of other companies.
It is worth noting that 5 of JJ’s blockbuster drugs will loose their
patent protection by 2014. This may turn out to be a blessing in disguise
for JJ. They make $7.1B (before tax) from pharmaceuticals, $8.3B from
medical devises and diagnostics and $2.3B from customer care.
Indeed I do believe for JJ pharmaceuticals, this is something that will
how to begin.
I like the idea of businessbook being one of four companies from the beginning,
but how will it immediately make money?
The first consideration is that is has no costs, development and staff
operate from the universities.
I think we need to consider, revenue for companies, in terms of which
company engaged the client and which one set up the connection, and which
For instance, say JJ has a branch in Australia, and they use their own
strength and ingenuity to send some of their staff (half paid by EEE)
over to Sydney to start recruiting local and large businesses onto the
system, they should for ever more see a commission, from an EEE perspective
it matters little who makes the money as it all contributes to “Give
However we do have to consider efficiency, if two years down the line,
there is a university in Sydney and JJ are not doing any work, it stifles
the process, so maybe we look at a 4 year cut off.
This said, the general idea with businessbook, is that every company benefits,
as such every company wants to use it; it would make a lot of sense for
JJE to look to expand to the areas it has recruited. 75%owned by new businesses
and owned 25% by JJE for recruiting the new businesses.
11.59 am GMT - Friday January 20th 2012
This work has proved to be a very useful exercise, it has highlighted
that much of the first phase for all companies will be to create the network,
this may affect the share split, as individual people not in business
owning shares is useful from a “they will love and wish to buy from
the network” perspective. However we can always perform this exercise
on the global model, if we exchange that 4T block for start ups and SME’s,
the network will grow quicker and the money will come sooner.
Yes I think we have to change the share options, however I’d like
to consider that 4T block not as an investment block, or not fully at
least rather as a start up block, in a similar way to the C-Agency example.
It goes like this:
John smith likes what he knows about the system, plays the tutorial game
and proves adept at travel; he has no money to invest, so he starts as
an affiliate to JJE Travel. He is a sole trader and has a $28,802 profit
ceiling (in one year) the first year he does not make it, the second year
he makes $38,802 and $10,000 is put in his bucket, the next year he makes
$50,000 his bucket is full and is exchanged for a part of the main JJE
Town. Thus each year he receives $7,451 in dividends, his excess becomes
the start of his next bucket, which by the following year (given the same
degree of success) will be full the following year. As such he will receive
$14.901. By this time he will have contributed $59,605 which will be enough
for either a dedicated office, or a share of a hotel or villa. He can
sell these at any time, work from or just gather rental money.
Having become successful in his initial field, most likely inbound travel
to his local area or outbound from his local area to a country or continent
abroad, he can now add new territories, example: John had concentrated
on Safaris in Africa, now he adds Hotels and Villas, in places like Cape
Town, Mauritius etc. As such he now has two sources of $28,802 profit
and his dividends, office or fractional ownership of a Hotel or Villa.
John smith is off to a flying start and will become a Travel tycoon in
no time at all, and remember he invested no capital.
Yes, I think we have to include this is the shares block, it encourages
start up’s and becomes the recruiting tool for companies like JJE,
as such the job of JJE, in Travel is primarily to pick their partners,
on advice from those at the university, and game results.
As for businessbook, we do not have a 40 page business plan as we do for
travel, it stands to reason however that businessbook will eventually
be the all powerful company. I like the idea of connecting 4 company blocks
together to make a $16 Billion investment and having one of the 4 businessbook,
if the company block at the beginning is strong, no business can fail,
as it has the profit of businessbook running through it, businessbook
can be adjusted between 1% and 10% commission depending what is needed.
It is the heart of the PQS.
It makes sense for businessbook companies to be the smallest blocks, the
$1Billion, as such the job of all at the new sites will be to canvas the
area and add people to the network. As with the travel example, should
the locals wish to fully incorporate not just use the tools, they can
be set a target, and once beaten, and their bucket full, the local site
can either expand or satellites sites can be created, or the property
acquisition could simply be that they buy the shop or office that they
are currently working from, all be it the latter does not stimulate the
Let’s have a quick look at the 4 JJ companies again
It may well be better instead of 4 half towns (2Billion each), having
16 at $500M each
This way they can have a head office in one of the big Cities ($2B) (4km2)
and 12 individual half districts ($500M x 12 = $6B) (1km2 x12) the balance
for all the half districts being made up by businesses within the county)
not only can they start work on businessbook, so by over time increasing
the land acquisitions in the area, they can also leverage of their other
They can recruit all local businesses to businessbook and the financial
software, where many businesses will incorporate, so over time increasing
the size from a district to a small town.
They can create travel agencies and organize the travel to their new resorts.
They can do all the building, set up and incorporate Real Estate agencies.
They can create all the energy sources, and continually use some of the
“Special Projects” money to add to these.
Note: if alternate energy was a profitable business we would not be using
oil, whether alternate energy is an out and out loss maker or weather
it does not make that much profit is not currently known, however it is
probably the most important factor, as such, if we follow this split company
route in future, I will suggest that not only do all companies have to
have a Energy company, they also have to build a certain amount to apparatus
each year, once in profit.
Obviously some places are better than others, The Nevada desert for example
is an obvious choice for solar panels, Mountainous regions for Dams, and
windy regions for wind turbines, all be it we are not keen on wind turbines
as they are harmful to birds, on the same topic, Dams in rivers are frowned
upon due to the fish.
In business terms this will mean little to most, however following nature
is the science, without the science no EEE.
We have little knowledge about the transference of Energy, for example,
if JJE had a base near San Francisco could it add to the solar station
in Nevada and draw energy from there?
Note: Without doubt, over time, alternate energy projects will become
profitable, if we consider that over 8 years, JJE & Partners will
have spent $4Billion on solar energy, they will have created a significant
output, which will be making a fair amount of profit, maybe $250 Million
a year. We need to factor in improvements in technology, with millions
on the project; I would find it hard to believe that energy efficiency
and output would not have doubled twofold, as such it would be generating
$1Billion a year.
It has already been mentioned that clean energy should be considered in
the same light as free range chickens, as such charging $1.50 as opposed
to $1.00 per unit will be acceptable by some, further, all EEE residences
will be mandated to use clean energy, however the houses and offices and
municipal services will have been constructed in such a fashion to reduce
energy usage as such, there will be no loss.
The New Sparta plan, called for a complete ban on fossil fuel vehicles
except good vehicles, this has seemed an impossible objective in the USA;
it is however looking more possible. President Obama has called for a
new initiative to boost the USA car industry and this could be just the
One could start of course by simply encouraging electric cars in the cities
and districts, with a view to a tax in two to four years, with an outright
ban in four to eight years.
All the time, laying the infrastructure for eclectic cars (electric points
on the roads, in garages etc) and working with the rest of the world to
make them more efficient.
Considering we are looking at 25% of shares immediately to big companies,
we may need to consider splitting the companies further. As such, companies
get ¼ of all planed territories, thus speeding up the creation
of the network. In most cases it would take less than a year to raze the
next quarter from existing businesses in the areas, and then the last
50% can come from developing business into EEE, more local businesses
and strategic foreign partners.
This needs carful thought as to who is the most important, we may have
to consider, literally doubling the size, not from the initial offering,
rather the size of expansion as local businesses and start ups wish to
either invest incorporate or build up to. Excluding any local business
or start up that wished to join would stifle progress.
5.51 pm GMT - Thursday January 20th 2011
This exercise is bearing fruit, to the point that an argument that we
can create not $16 Trillion but $32 Trillion.
If we consider JJ as a 25% owner of the smallest block ($1B 2sq km) (they
pay $250M) they will be assigned a county. Within that country there will
be enough companies to double up, in investment alone. It makes sense
to save a ($250M) share block for the global market (individual citizens
by themselves or 50/50 with their governments) and the last quarter to
businesses that start up and use their profit to buy in.
After the full block is accounted for, we need to consider expansion,
it’s only fair to offer JJE another ¼ option, and the same
would apply for the local businesses, the remaining 50% available to other
local businesses that have worked the system to profit. As such we are
now looking at $32 Trillion in the USA.
This of course significantly improves all economic factors for USA Gov,
double the jobs, and double everything.
This is a significant improvement on the model, however It may be best
as a counter rather than a presentation, i.e. if someone says, you will
never get such and such by this date, we can throw in, “well please
remember we are working on half expectations in the first place!”
I need a graphic.
JJ invest $8B
They get 16 half B’s or 32 ¼ B’s
Let’s consider 16 ¼ B’s = $4B
Let’s add a corporate office $2B
If we consider
the idea that we wish every territory to duplicate itself, we need to
reassess this model.
More like this
will be closer to 2 territories per county. Adjust again
would cost $500 Million, $125M for infrastructure, thus $2.5M for a hospital
is well within budget.
Let’s have a look at the “Give Half Back”: GHB will
need to equal $125M (1/4 GHB, 1/4 Dividends, 1/2 company expansion.
$125 = 50% for University/businessbook and 50% City upkeep
City upkeep 1/4 Social security, 1/4 Municipality, 1/4 Improvements, 1/4
Acquisitions $31.25M each
Plenty to run the hospital, when we consider the staff are part of the
This means we are creating 11,874 new hospitals in the USA, same for schools
This becomes a part of the PR, local businesses and citizens will love
EEE. With 11874, we have about one EEE presence per 2 to 3 “places”
1KM2 costs $500M, I wish to do a double check, double checked: 1KM2 costs
As such, we are looking for 4 partners per 1km2 ASAP and the balance over
2. Big businesses (operating in the area)
4. Independent contractors and sole traders
5. New Enterprises.
6. General public (local)
7. General public (international)
8. International businesses
(Note we are looking to make 2KM2)
As such JJ, invest $125M in each new territory
So $8 Billion = 32 units
16 Mini suburbs ($125) =$2Billion
4 Mini+ suburbs ($250) =$1Billion
2 Mini++ suburbs ($500) =$1Billion
2 Town ($2B) =$2Billion
1 City ($2B) =$2Billion
& Johnson Ecology
am GMT - Saturday January 21th 2011
It will be best if I make the diagram for JJE in the standard $4Billion
not $8Billlion, further it may be better not to make it for JJE rather
a generic name
We will work in units of $125 Million, and use the category numbers
So $4 Billion = 32 units
|| 8 Units
Before we get to the USA debt solution, we would like to point out that
Union and tax cuts aside, all that you have read thus far is in line with
the Democratic and Republican initiatives to assist the US economy.
President Obama & Vice president Biden:
Tax Cut for Middle Class American Families.
S-World does not advise tax cuts until deficit
2. 2. Energy Rebates: Obama and Biden will enact a windfall profits
tax on excessive oil company profits
All extra income sources or savings are useful
3. Create Jobs through Fair Trade
In line with EEE, S-World, businessbook &
the concept of Network (Embassy) Cities
4. Create 5 Million Green Jobs
Completely in line with EEE proposals
5. New Jobs Through National Infrastructure Investment
Completely in line with EEE proposals
6. Creating Jobs in Technology & Innovation industries
Completely in line with EEE proposals
7. Support Small Business
Covered extensively in EEE proposals
8. Labor: Obama and Biden will ensure that labor appointees support
workers' rights and will work to ban the permanent replacement of striking
S-World advises against this action due to reasons
set out below*
9. Protect Homeownership and Crack Down on Mortgage Fraud
Addressed by Sienna.Gov financial software
Give a tax credit to all middle-class homeowners.
S-World does not advise tax cuts until deficit
10. Address Predatory Credit Card Practices
Addressed in “Customer Service ratings”
monitored by Sienna.Gov financial software
11. Reform Bankruptcy Laws
Companies close to bankruptcy will be priority
companies to be assisted and made strong in EEE
12. Work/Family Balance: Obama and Biden will help working families
by doubling funding for after-school programs, expanding the Family
Medical Leave Act.
EEE started with one mans promise to help single
S-World does not advise tax cuts until deficit
In line with EEE, S-World, businessbook &
the concept of Network (Embassy) Cities
domestic energy production,
Completely in line with EEE proposals (Alternate
S-World supports this action due to the reasons
set out below*
Completely in line with EEE proposals
a constitutional amendment to balance the budget.
We suggest that S-world is said constitutional
it appears that both Republican and Democratic parties are largely in
line with all that is EEE, particularly President Obama’s initiates
on “Green Jobs”, “National Infrastructure Investment”,
“Creating Jobs in Technology & Innovation” & “Small
Business Support”. However it needs to be noted that Precedent Obama’s
initiates require substantial borrowing, where EEE needs none.
Better to save a little today, so all can be prosperous tomorrow, we suggest
waiting two years. In the long term however S-World suggests many tax
With 23,300 US citizens looking for a job, creating the environment where
you cannot replace inefficient, disruptive or lazy workers with enthusiastic
ones is a terrible mistake. It is this action that brings businesses to
their knees. Better one inefficient, disruptive or lazy worker let go,
than loosing an entire business.
Both parties see free trade as a good idea, this could not be more important
Beautiful Butterfly Effect, (Sans PQS)
For us at
S-World, this is the exciting part, this is where the mathematics becomes
beautiful, and as such we can get a little over excited. The ripple effect
of cash flow, from S-World to project, project to contractors, contractors
to suppliers and staff and on and on, thousands of variables tens of millions
of direct beneficiaries, hundreds of billions of indirect positive effects.
However without the PQS1.01 (predictive quantum software) we will not
be able to calculate that degree of accuracy. This said, there is nothing
new about the beautiful butterfly effect, and cause an effect of investment
and cash flow, whether it is usually done simply by a bunch of clever
people with spreadsheets or whether there is a basic version of the PQS
in existence we can not say.
We can however make some targets, targets are exactly what they say, there
is no point setting a low targets. So we at s-world are going to apply
Angle Steve Job’s: “Reality Distortion Field”. This
is how the engineers and designers working on the first Apple Mackintosh
in the early 80’s described Steve’s unrealistic demands.
Earlier in 1975, in his first commercial partnership with Steve Wozniak,
he tasked Wozniak with making a game for Atari. Jobs gave him four days
and insisted it had far fewer chips that usual. “A game like that
would take most engineers a few months!” Wozniak exclaimed. Steve
Job’s put up his “Reality Distortion Field” and insisted,
four days later a sleep deprived Wozniak had finished and used considerably
less chips than requested.
The “Reality Distortion Field” will not work every time, but
without it, Apple would not be No1. As such the S-World targets may seem
impossible, but “even in failure we strive for perfection”
(CB). Just to be on the safe side however, we will set targets that if
half achieved will still leave the USA in a profitable situation.
Before we get going, a quick word on why the West is in such trouble,
there are a few causes the main being population growth, 1960: 3 Billion,
2012: 7 Billion. With more people come fewer resources and more social
security, since 1960 the standard of living in the west has stayed stable.
We need to consider the problem, not in terms of money but in resources,
our population is expanding quicker than our planet and technology can
EEE (The Ecological Experience Economy) is not about money, it is about
addressing the resource gap. The first phase of “America Butterfly”
creates 8 million homes, housing one in 12 US citizens. The alternate
energy initiatives provide essential resources that are running out at
an alarming rate. Free medicines will not just add comfort to those in
pain, they will make the workforce stronger and happier. For all this
however it is the millions of advances and developments that will be created
in the universities that will bridge the resource gap.
And so it begins
The USA debt is currently at, $15,250 Trillion, the USA debt clock suggests
if the problem is not addressed it will reach $24 Trillion by 2015
Rising by +/- 1.9 trillion each year
Estimated limit before loss of AAA credit rating $17 Trillion
Target 1: Make sure the USA does not loose its AAA credit rating and Debt
to GDP Ratio stays below 100%
(predicted to occur by the end of 2012 by the Office of Management and
procurement from the USA Gov $0 to $4 Trillion over 4 years; we have
no stats on availability of land in the government sector. Split the
difference. $1 Trillion in 2012 another $1 Trillion by late 2013.
Result: $17 Trillion limit extended an extra year until 2014
2. Lowering the deficit by the methods to be described shortly
Result: $17 Trillion limit extended an extra year until 2015.
3. As deficit starts to decrease quickly or slowly confidence will be
restored in the USA as the safest investment, as such the estimated
limit before loss of AAA credit rating rises far above $20 Trillion.
Note: There are over 13,000 banking institutions in the world, the top
ten alone are holding +/- $20 Trillion, its not about money its about
Result: As long as the USA continues to lower its deficit, there is
no chance of it loosing its AAA rating.
2: Make the USA profitable
So let’s have a look a few ways we will accomplish this,
Tax: Three years ago, the USA Gov stated they believed
there was $350 Billion in unpaid tax. The system not only calculates
and pays tax; it will do it in real time, thus creating additional cash
It is highly likely, that there is a lot more that $350 Billion going
missing, and this estimate was based on what they believed should have
been collected using their current systems, not the total figure.
Without a referendum on compulsory usage it may take a handful of years
before the majority of business use the Sienna.Gov software. However
the PQS will be able to spot tax evaders within a couple of years.
target tax yield up by $500 Billion
told, companies make and save a lot more revenue by using the software
than they would loose by paying the correct tax. Further like all S-World
actions opens the door to tax cuts for all.
The New Sparta Greek model is to eliminate all payroll and VAT Tax!
Working on the principal this will drive industry and increase corporation
tax (assisted by “Give Half Back”. However Greece has only
got 6 Million people, as such this model can not be considered in the
USA. However as soon as the deficit goes down, tax cuts are warmly welcomed.
Medicare & Medicade $743 Billion: Every town or suburb, be it 1
sq km or 1000 sq km’s will have excellent hospitals, linked to
the medical and pharmaceutical development sections of the university.
In four years one would how to have a substitute drug for 90% of all
Americans needs. Few would argue that we can half this figure so saving
Social Security, Unemployment, and Welfare $1,266 Trillion: 16 New Sparta
Cities will house $31,244,288. Due to “Give Half Back” all
welfare is covered as is schooling. My first priority is single mothers,
(a promise I made, that started everything) plus there is a lot we can
learn from children! Addressing this problem, is addressing the problems
of the future. Qualifications or no qualifications, we have thousands
of universities. And in my life, I’ve rarely seen any difference
is a worker with or without an academic record.
families on welfare second, that must be quite a burden on the state,
if we consider half the residents will be working, we are directly creating
15.5 Million jobs that’s more than all the official unemployed.
all the above I’d hope to take another $300 of the bill.
4. Oil, I may be out here, but it seems the USA spends about $450 Billion
a year on importing Oil, I’ve been trying to work out how many
Dams (Mountain not river, cant hurt the fish) it would take to cover
this figure could it be done for $4 Trillion I wonder, if so the Oil
companies will happily invest in such a venture, even at $8 Trillion
its still a good deal considering they won’t have any oil left
in 20 years and a properly constructed Dam will last for a hundred years.
deal of course would be until the USA economy is nicely in profit, the
power is for free.
Its possible here that we are looking at another $300
So far we
are at $1,320 and we have not even considered the “American Butterfly”
the tax yield from the new EEE companies is tricky as we need to factor
in the current USA companies that will join, which may be all of them,
as such it will just be a transference.
however factor the companies that invested the $16,384 Trillion, and
it would be naive to consider they would be generating less that $1
Trillion, however that may be business taken from another as such maybe
$500 Billion is more appropriate.
to consider is construction, construction companies will be extremely
busy and would most likely generate an extra $200 Billion a year..
And we have
broken the $2 Trillion mark at $2,020 Trillion.
efficiency across the entire private sector due to software network
and in general improved technology and think tanks from the universities.
seems like a nice figure to be debated.
7. In general the global recession being over, so trade and taxes are
restored to pre recession levels
is about what the Wikipedia date suggests.
could do a lot more than just collect tax, I don’t wish to be
obtuse, but from what I have seen the USA internal networks and financial
software are shocking, I’ll refer to my notes
Ok in general they overspent by $400 Billion over the Budget which was
$400B over income forecast which in return was over estimated by $600
Billion and somewhere they managed to spend another $400B on top which
was the estimated deficit.”
not good, budgets need to be stuck to, forecasts need to be accurate
and overspending in general is ill advised, the president, the party
and congress, need very simple real time figures, if one is making a
profit, great, if now, all hands to the pump, as opposed to looking
at the figures a year after events and blaming the accountants.
there is up to trillion to be saved and made if the USA were to use
the software, but I’ll be safe and half that to $500 Billion
And there we have it without, touching the defense or any discretionary
budgets, we can half all estimates and still be strong, as we are yet
American Butterfly & Predictive Quantum Software.
Note building prices go up, and local schools have more cash and less
concentrate on building economics