American Butterfly V: 1.01 is relatively proficient; its basic structure
was created for business and a smaller country: Greece, where it was possible
to create companies that would make 100% profit per year in terms of their
initial investment. However in the larger model, greater internal competition
is created as such the figures need to be reworked on a 25% profit basis,
as such the “Give Half Back” initiative, will be less effective.
However in terms of solving the USA long term Medicaid/Medicare issue
and bringing the USA Economy into profit and then into the black, this
solution is still solid
For the sake of posterity, we have decided to present this as V: 1.01
the original beta version, we hope you enjoy the work; it is, as all say
Butterfly demonstrates the solution to the USA debt crisis, whist written
for the USA, a similar system can be applied to the Euro zone.
“American Butterfly” is so named as it is, in part influenced
by “Chaos Theory” and the “Butterfly Effect”,
in simple terms: Order out of Chaos and the ripple effect of investment
and systems increasing profits & reducing spending whilst improving
This solution for the USA is to create profit, without adversely compromising
citizen’s wellbeing, or the countries security. Any solution that
looks to lower the deficit to a manageable figure will buy time and time
alone as interest payments will soon become unmanageable, and Medicare/Medicaid
The last time the USA made a profit was in 1981, since this time the population
has risen by 36%. At the heart of “American Butterfly” is
the creation of over 10,000 Cities, towns and suburbs across the USA all
including: Practical universities, educational centers & hospitals.
Practical universities are not simply places to gain certificates; they
exist to improve research and development in all fields whilst creating
a GTN (Global Trade Network) operations centre.
When one discusses the USA debt problem, the only unit to be considered
is a Trillion; the first phase of “American Butterfly” looks
for just over $16 Trillion, which in the world of quantum mechanics is
a small number. One of the problems we will encounter will be satisfying
demand, as the investment will be oversubscribed. This however created
the desire to invest and leaves enough cash flow to address the global
Detail is provided later, for now consider these two statistics,
Besides the influence of “Chaos Theory”, there is little here
that has not been done before or being developed now, as such all is possible,
all has precedent.
Bill Gates made a foundation to provide vaccines and serve the greater
• First National Bank, South Africa, connected their bank to reservation
• Travel GDS’s & the world trade centre have created
small to medium “Global Trade Networks”
• Google created a virtual world that mirrors real life and renders
• Companies are currently considering making operating systems
• Stanford University created a practice university, now called
• From next to nothing in an arid area, Dubai was build and popularized.
• 17% of the world’s energy already comes from alternate
If we add
to and improve all these models, then hold them rigidly within a non chaotic
economic structure, each bounces off each other, not becoming twice the
sum of their parts, far more. The circle is continuous, possibly infinite,
and that’s what makes the difference, this is what we call “The
Beautiful Butterfly Effect”
Butterfly” describes the formula for a new economic system, the
collective gathering and advancement of technology and medicines, plus
an ecological initiative that desires most of the world energy produced
in a “green” manor by 2027.
Before we go into details of the systems, business plans and investment
models a very quick overview of what we wish to achieve.
Bring USA into profit.
We have targets,
we have secondary targets, we have contingencies and we have worst case
scenarios. As best we can see, there is no reason why our primary target
cannot be achieved. However in our experience even the best laid plans
succumb to inefficiencies of those that implement them. As such, if the
primary target fails by 50%, the secondary target is still acceptable.
If that target fails by 50% the contingency target is still acceptable,
if the contingency target fails by 50% the worst case scenario still brings
the USA into profit.
Further it needs to be considered, “American Butterfly” is
largely the brainchild of one man, it is highly likely that when the USA’s
brightest and finest assist “American Butterfly” will be improved.
For this reason we are pressing for the primary target and will be deeply
disappointed if it is not achieved,
Targets desired by 2016,
Improved Tax Collection
Medicare & Medicade
Social Security, Unemployment, and Welfare
New companies paying tax
Increased efficiency in the private sector
Normal trading after recession
Improved Government systems
savings do not see a lessening of service.
Total $2.950 Trillion a year.
Software, Economics &
With millions of software designers and computer coders in the world,
creating software is simple enough, the only factor is time. The hard
part is working out what one wishes the software to achieve. A million
people could code facebook; only one had the idea of how to make it special
and how to popularize it.
As such what is being presented is “what we wish to achieve”
and how to popularize it.
What do we wish to achieve?
software that can predict the future
2. Financial software that removes human error from the accounting process
3. Business software that calculates and pays tax in real time
4. Networking software hard wired in to every database on the planet
5. Virtual software that brings the planet together
6. A monopoly on future computerized TV operating systems
7. Advanced CRM, business advisory, communications & psyche test
8. Conscious software with a human brain equivalency of 107
All of the
8 specifications are “More than we know now”, add them all
together and we create something wonderful.
The latter: “8. Conscious software with a human brain equivalency
of 107"” simply indicates our desired to have 107 (100 Million)
humans using the software to assist the network.
Parts 2 to 7 are all improvements or up scaling on existing technology
covered in the larger presentation.
1. “Economic software that can predict the future” is however
a new concept that needs to be explained.
First its name: Predictive Quantum Software (PQS) Predictive
as it predicts economic trends and Quantum as it connects the very large
(Global Gross GDP) to the very small (dollars and cents with a four point
decimal place) +/-7017
What we want it to achieve.
Example: The UK government have recently given, the go ahead for a 32.7
Billion pound railway, predicted to make two pounds for every pound
spent, this statistic however is debated!
Instead of $32.7 Billion consider $16 Trillion in infrastructure, construction
& education: From project to supplier to worker, creating jobs,
saving social security and stimulating the local economy. This is basic
economic predictions that would be made for any government project.
This is what we call “the beautiful butterfly effect” the
ripple of cause and effect, action and reaction.
add the frame work of core software:
software that removes human error from the accounting process”
“Business software that calculates and pays tax in real time”
“Networking software hard wired in to most databases on the
“Advanced CRM, business advisory, communications & psyche
“Conscious software with a human brain equivalency of 107”
can track the ripple far further, the flow of money as its changes hands
again and again, calculating the benefits of one investment over another,
not in terms of immediate performance, rather long term economic growth.
It will also spot threats, black holes where the money disappears, crime,
fraud, tax evasion, gamblers, drugs, hording, terrorism etc. If the
money stops, there will be a reason, and it can be investigated.
2. How it is possible:
In a little while we will go into some detail about the +10,000 thousands
of new districts, towns and cities created, and the tens of millions
of new jobs. For now just consider, all employees will be paid under
the proviso they use credit/debit cards linked to the system, plus cash
is frowned upon within the new residences, as such one can track the
money. Not indefinably, but enough to give excellent data on spending
patterns in the new territories, as the system grows, so will the data
non chaotic structure needed for it to work:
need to understand the basics of “Chaos Theory”, source
dictates: “Small differences in initial conditions (such as those
due to rounding errors in numerical computation) yield widely diverging
outcomes for chaotic systems, rendering long-term prediction impossible”.
is a primary field within “Chaos Theory” thus, long-term
prediction has always been considered impossible.
we even consider the rounding errors, there is a far greater problem
within economics: Millions of people = Billions of mistakes, as such
the “financial software that removes human error from the accounting
process” is the primary building block of the entire system, it’s
easy enough to make, simply connect the financial programs to the banks,
tailor it to every conceivable business type and have a colossal support
the rounding errors, we simply need to change the way we count, to blocks
of four, starting at $4 Billion, dividing down and multiplying up, then
containing company earnings within the block, rounding internally.
Pressure of Profit” (POP)
Each block (bucket) indicates $4 Billion
are then frozen at a certain level, e.g. $4Billion, once achieved the
excess flows into what we call a “Bucket” not to be touched
until it is worth $4Billion at which point it is exchanged for land &
real estate and a new company is formed, (same shareholders) after which
the process repeats.
Thus we create
a non chaotic economic structure, no human error, no rounding errors and
predictable company profits (the company will always make $4Billion) The
new company then grows at an accelerated rate as it still has the founder
companies profit flowing into it.
this creates a domino effect as new companies and towns are created faster
and faster. Plus all companies are intrinsically linked; they cannot fail
as one supports the other, we call this “The Pressure of Profit”,
it is the foundation for what we call.
Protected Capitalism” (EPC)
two reasons for the name Ecologically Protected Capitalism, firstly we
consider the new companies created by the POP system similar to layers
of bark on a tree, each one protecting the initial layer, the second is
the entire EEE (Ecological Experience Economy) project is based around
protecting the planet, which despite the very left wing connotations associated
with ecology, makes perfect sense from a scientific perspective, and to
ignore science in life is very narrow minded, particularly in this day
not find a “rated” scientist that will not tell you that nature,
beauty and symmetry are the fundamental elements in progress, as such
“American Butterfly” and its Greek predecessor “Sparta
Rises Again” have followed natures path, and been inspired by the
creative process, being conducted largely via the author walking through
nature, puzzling at problems and working on solutions.
As such we
use the title for the money making process “Ecologically Protected
Capitalism” as it is in natures interest to protect the project,
as such it is in the earth’s interest to protect the project and
with other life in the universe looking less and less likely, it is in
the universe’s to protect the project. As such Ecologically Protected
Capitalism, or if you prefer “Universally Protected Capitalism”
is any genuine protection from Gaia theory and the like, remains to be
seen, it is however something nice to consider and has been well considered,
all be it thus far only creatively connecting “Gaia theory”,
“The Theory of Relativity”, “Space Time”, “Super
Symmetric String Theory”, “Chaos theory” &“Quantum
Mechanics” as the diagram bellow indicates.
and without mathematical dispute scientists broke the speed of light which
is impossible as it requires infinite energy, the only credible explanation
is within super symmetrical string theory which states there are 6 or
7 more dimensions than our current 4 (width, height, depth and time) where
time is a constant. It is claimed that a set or 3 or 4 dimensions has
no light and as the neutrinos (very small particles) passed through it,
there was no resistance so they sped up.
To help one
consider, we have replaced the unknown dimensions with known quantities,
it is said the dimensions lie together like slices of bread. As the neutrinos
only sped up by a few nanoseconds The dimension set must be incredibly
small and as such it must be well ordered, or “without chaos’:
we consider this dimension, as a dream, as dreams rehire no light, and
as such we consider the possibility of consciousness and further the development
of consciousness in evolution.
most significant scientific discoveries including Einstein’s theory
of relativity (E=MC2) many of the breakthroughs in EEE have come as consciousness
experiments revolving around beauty, which is better described scientifically
as symmetry, the authors’ consciousness experiment being specific
to prove the continuing existence of his daughter Sienna’s consciousness.
As such we have a thin argument that Ecologically Protected Capitalism
is not just a name based on POP and the layers of bark on a tree, but
actually a genuine force that states if one follows nature and protects
it one will be more successful.
of profit (POP)
new companies are founded, the faster the flow of profit, in the diagram
by 2023 the founding has created 9 new companies. With the profit of 9
companies flowing into the 10th it may well generate $4Billion in profit
within a month, thus making enough for another land acquisition, thus
creating more jobs, universities, operations basses and hospitals, as
such continually increasing tax revenues whist lowering government spending
However companies may well choose a different road, the third company
formed may decide to look at a long term alternate energy project, using
most of the profit from companies “A” and “B”
to assist with a gigantic solar energy project in the Nevada Desert. This
will slow up company expansion, but in the long term create a very solid
income source, everyone will always need energy, and with millions upon
millions of citizens working on improving solar technology, in the long
term, it may be the most profitable of all the companies.
Protection, (Ecologically Protected Capitalism)
In this above
example we show many companies expanding simultaneously with the profit
flowing from the founder companies outwards, all companies are protected
by each other, all with the exception of the “outer rim” or
what we call “the edge of chaos” all companies are predictable,
all will make $4Billion, if one under performs it has the profit of the
others flowing through it, the only vulnerable companies are at the “Edge
Creating conglomerates of 16 companies in either complimentary industries
or a global spread, creates greater strength, in some cases expansion
will only occur after all founder companies reach their POP limit and
their collective bucket is full. This will be more the case for smaller
conglomerates, for instance 16 individual companies with a POP limit of
$953,674 creating a $30,517,587 conglomerate which connects to a further
15 conglomerates making $488,281,250 and so on.
The initial founder companies have virtually no cost as manpower is provided
by the University, shops offices, factories are covered by infrastructure
budgets. All will be part owners of the “Global Trade Network”
all will get to choose their partners, and all will be able to choose
industries that gain orders from the collective. As such, all will be
profitable, if for any reason one falters, immediately the resources of
the universities and collective ordering will be applied, and in a lost
case scenario money can be diverted from what we call “Give Half
Nature is the inspiration for much of the work in “American Butterfly”;
consider the POP process like a tree, each year creating another layer
of bark. The tree itself grows leaves which produce oxygen, much like
company staff get paid and produce revenue, the oxygen mixes with Hydrogen
and becomes water that then feeds the trees roots and it grows, in the
same way staff spend money on goods and grow the economy. However in this
model, we have included a safety buffer called “Give Half Back”
to protect the company and staff.
a solid political slogan, “Give Half Back” is the economic
machine that keeps the wheels of EEE (Ecological Experience Economy) moving.
The concept started in March 2011 when EEE creator “Nick Raymond
Ball” made the noble decision to give all the proceeds made from
the original “Global Trade Network” to good causes after VIRGIN
had assessed and approved the business plan and financials. The deal was
to be 50/50 so with VIRGIN keeping 50% and Nick Ray Ball investing the
other 50% in humanity, so came the collective name “Give Half Back”
The financials VIRGIN approved showed a $50 Billion return, a drop in
the ocean in terms of the “American Butterfly” presentation,
but still in human terms a significant amount. The PR value was of course
immense. However following the example made by Bill Gates a system was
developed that was far more efficient that just charity donation.
example starts after Feeder Company 1 has been formed; this happened as
soon as its founder company made $4 Billion in profit and exchanged it
for Land & Real estate and funds for its University (Research &
In the above example “Founder Company 1”, generates $4Billion
after tax in one year, 50% goes into “Feeder Company 1” and
is added to whatever profit it makes. 25% of company profit is returned
to the original investors as $1 Billion in dividends. The balance is split
between the founder companies operations (University) and its Real Estate
holdings (explained later)
The funds to the “University” pay for staff, research &
development: “Special Projects” create long term investments,
brand awareness and PR. It is to be noted that all within reason technological
advances and developments created in the tens of thousands of universities
are available to all EEE companies. All medical alternate energy and agriculture
developments are free to the world.
The funds to the “City” ensure their real estate holdings
are continually improved and the citizens that live there are well looked
after. With a population cap of 8192 people per $4 Billion property investment
if only one in three people were at work, there is change from the social
security budget if each received $20,000 a year.
The Medi Outreach program provides hospital care for citizens in the local
vicinity, thus solving the undisputed long term threat to the USA economy:
The cost of Medicare & Medicaid.
The Municipality budget pays for the running of the town’s, cities
The Improvements & Acquisitions budget see’s the Real Estate
and Land continually improved and exceptionally well maintained. Any money
left over from the other three budgets gets added to this budget, this
budget can be used for purchasing property off site.
“Give Half Back” has come a long way since its original name
“The Sienna Foundation” and its intent to assist mothers who
had lost their children. It has become a new economic system, which in
one way is for the people and socialism, and is in another for companies
and capitalism, forcing companies into good business practices such as
securing their companies with land acquisitions, in a similar vein to
McDonalds and creating a social security network for their employees so
The open source nature of the research enables companies to adapt to change,
and journey into avenues they would not previously have been able to pursue.
Further with an even technological playing field, running a successful
company becomes a race for perfection in service, experience, value and
Now we are starting to see the economic picture, we have never ending,
infrastructure and construction stimulation, creating jobs and cash flow
where ever a company is based. As the children, elderly, infirm are taken
care of by the companies; there is no need for social security or welfare
with any EEE town, cities or suburb. The money for the university creates
more jobs and drives innovation, and the combined technological advances
of all universities sharing technology, speeds up innovation in general.
It is this advanced learning system, which will ultimately make the difference.
“Global Trade Network”
As we have
just read, 50% of all “Give half back money” goes to the universities
or “Special Projects”, a perpetual state of mass funding,
which can only grow bigger as new advances and technologies are developed
to aid the companies that created them.
Before this process we see the initial investment round, 25% of all investment
is destined for the universities. Over $4 Trillion for the USA, ring fenced
over 8 years, the additional revenue from “Give Half Back”
either a top up or “Special projects” allowance.
If we consider at least 50% of the $500 Billion a year, is earmarked for
salaries, this would pay for 5 million teachers $50,000 a year. However,
the university is not simply an educational establishment.
A number of years back when the question of climate control was put to
President Bush, he answered by exclaiming that the USA would tackle the
problem via technology. Few would argue that such an enormous budget will
create many ways to improve not only our economy but our planet.
It is desired to have only 20% of staff as teachers, the balance being
made up of scientists, economists, academics, business analysts, and a
lot of paid interns in a continual state of learning, whilst collectively
working on “The Global Trade Network”, or as we wish to call
Note: Interns are not simply college graduates; we are equally interested
in retirees and those that have been caught in a rut, dependent on social
security and in general bored. Single mothers regardless of their academic
background, and families in depressed areas that wish to work, are specifically
identified. And with over 10,000 new Cities, towns and suburbs planned,
there will be few if any places in the USA that are not in reach of a
EEE university. Construction workers will be contracted directly by EEE
obliged to work 28 hours a week in construction and spend 2 days in the
50% of all time spent at the universities will be spent on the GTN “Global
Trade Network” and associated software. This time will largely be
spent in one to one relationships between the campus and the businesses
it supports, initially networking and customizing the software to businesses
specific needs, then group think tanks will analyze the data and offer
the CEO’s or designated handlers advice on opportunities and threats.
This process will never end; businesses will be analyzed and advised forever.
The end game of the Global Trade Network, as the name suggests is to create
a one stop shop for global commerce, as such a restaurant owner in Houston
can collectively order beverages with everyone else on the network, thus
lowering bottom line costs across the board. This function or idea is
not new, in travel there are “GDS’s” (Global distribution
Systems) the top 4 manage just under half of all hotel, flights and car
hire bookings, levying a per transaction fee between $1 to $4. The “GTN”
will however work on a percentage basis, the rate yet to be determined,
depending on needs.
The rest of automated bookings travel bookings are handled by “ADS’s”
(Alternate Distribution Systems) which until recently could not be networked
as the databases were incompatible. Technology however has now advances
to a stage where the vast majority of databases, travel or otherwise can
now be communally networked via API links (Application Programming Interface)
Networking businesses is not as simple as social networking, databases
need to be connected together by API connections, and one single business
may need 10,000 such connections. Thousands of people and companies will
be aware that the technology now exists, and within ten maybe twenty years,
there will be a “GTN”.
The reason thus far no one company has seriously considered creating it,
is a case of manpower and the willingness of companies to be globally
networked. The universities are desired (Globally) to house 100 million
people by providing the manpower; the willingness comes from both the
humanitarian and ecological initiatives of the “GTN” and its
economic stabilization purpose.
A GTN of some sort is inevitable, better it’s used in this fashion,
for these purposes than simply being created for one Standalone Company
to become monstrously rich. As such the public, companies and countries
across the world will welcome it. “It will work, because everyone
will wish it to work”
Equally as important is the human and financial aspect, the “GTN”
is further specified to run the financial departments of businesses, alleviating
fraud, costly human error eliminating the need for most or all administration
staff and accountants and auditors.
Sometimes the software alone will recommend opportunities and warn of
threats, at other times the think tanks will work in tandem with business
owners. If a business in France has become very successful via implementing
a new technology or purchase from a new network, it would make sense for
the business advisory team in Chicago, to analyze the data to see if it
would work for similar business types in their district. At the end of
the day, the better each business performs the more money for “Give
Half Back” and the less pressure on government’s budgets.
Within the universities the remaining 50% of the time, will be spent on
research, innovation and learning in general: Alternate energy and desalinization
processes will be a main focus, alongside this building economics and
logistics will lower the price of the developments thus making them more
attractive for investors. Medicine, vaccines & pharmaceuticals development
will be championed with results given freely to the world.
Within each university or territory will be a state of the art hospital
the larger towns and cities will have “Super University Hospitals”
alongside research laborites, initially the hospitals will do its best
to take care of not just the EEE Company’s staff and district residents,
but all that are near. With a midterm view of catering to all that are
in need, this is not only good PR, it makes excellent economic sense,
as sick people are not productive.
With over 10000 hospitals desired and free medicine, vaccines & pharmaceuticals,
not only are we improving care, we are cutting hundreds of billions of
homes can increase or decrease in value due to location.) (Ref)
In the last
section we heard that 25% of the initial investment money goes to schools
& universities, which in themselves are arguably the largest factor
in creating a desirable location, added to which from the very beginning,
immense resources will be put into building logistics, town planning,
architectural excellence, intelligent software to run the towns, cities
and houses within, and in general making the towns, cities and suburbs
luxury resorts with maximum desirability.
The balance of the investment (75% - $12 Trillion) is spent on creating
the perfect location, as such for every $4 Billion spent, between $4 Billion
to $12 Billion of sellable real estate, shops and offices will be created.
This, too many will be the single most important factor, it’s not
a hard stretch of the imagination to consider, the future of business
and technology is in the hands of those with tens of trillions of dollars
to spend on research and development, but that’s in the future.
Creating an immediate investment return, in one the safest investments
known to man (bricks and mortar) in the most desired country in the world
(USA) plus the technological bells and whistles that goes with it, creates
not just a good investment, but a jaw dropping must have, please, please,
please give me options.
The following shows a 25% land, 25% infrastructure, 25% building funds
allocation; this may be adjusted to best suit the profitability of the
development, for example: 20%, 20%, and 35%.
25% land procurement:
When discussing land development, we will discuss in the terms of plots,
whist we generally measure EEE companies in terms of $4Billion, when it
comes to “plots” we work in Company earnings of $1 Billion.
As such one plot is the equivalent of $1 Billion in company investment
and earnings and is made to handle +/- 2000 people. 25% land procurement
is equal to $250 Million.
factor in land procurement is the balance of nature, all new towns or
districts need to be an ecological improvement, with large parklands and
The exact size of the land and development will vary depending on initial
desirability points, a coastal district in California, may see $250 Million
acquiring 1km2 plots, whereas most areas will see $250 Million acquiring
4km2. Where ever a $250 Million plot is purchased a zoning restriction
will apply, the object to limit residential housing to cater for +/-2,000
citizens. This is important due to the “Give Half Back” social
security and municipal spending budgets.
It is also essential that all developments end up lowering carbon emissions;
this will be largely achieved by using an alternate energy source, energy
efficiency, large parkland spaces, large gardens & roof gardens.
In most areas of the USA $250 Million buys an awful lot of land, in many
cases instead of 4km2, 32km2 will be purchased, as such as the cities
expand, land will not inflate due to the increased desirability of the
location. This also has the effect of making future developments costs
lower to +/- 10% for land and the initial company can make $100 million
from each new development, thus further increasing their profits.
Initial plot size is not limited to 4km2 all be it larger plots will put
a strain on the initial infrastructure budget, however there is nothing
to stop the founder company opting for 8km2, largely leaving half alone
to be developed into a golf estate or even a ski resort at a later point,
so long as there are not more houses there are no restrictions, (hotels
and short term rental accommodation is permitted.)
Moving forwards, with an initial $16 Trillion development creating ecologically
balanced housing for 32,786,000, the bigger picture sees the provision
for the luxurious and ecologically balanced housing of 266,144,000 USA
citizens, which is necessary considering current population growth statistics.
Note: We have been very careful, not to suggest any measures that need
legislative change; however we desire two factors to be considered, especially
in high crime areas.
carrying of GPS ID cards, this will all but eliminate crime, a budget
for CCTV cameras covering all communal areas has been included. Said
cameras could spot any person moving that did not carry a GPS ID card.
2. No lethal weapons allowed in EEE districts.
$250 Million is available per 1km2 to 4km2 plot, larger plots will require
more infrastructure in terms of roads, railways etc. However the amount
of extra infrastructure is not proportional to the plots size, due to
the desire for larger plots to contain large expanses of park and woodland,
and larger gardens for houses. Further the larger plots will not be in
prime areas, where often construction is less expensive.
$250 Million will create excellent essential infrastructure and services:
Roads, cycle tracks, motorways, railways, water pipes & sewers, traffic
lights, CCTV cameras, electrical grid, water works, hospital, emergency
services, schools, crèches, Montessori schools, university campus,
university residences, community services, parkland and an alternate power
Note on alternate power source: In some or many cases it may not be possible
to contain the power source within or near the plot, in which case funds
will be allocated to the nearest available source and a credit system
will be enacted. In the case of plots that do not predict an ecological
benefit via their creation, more alternate power will need to be created
and sold to the local community until the balance with nature is restored.
Where ever possible, plots will seek to create more power than they require
so feeding the local community.
A typical founding town/district infrastructure budget based on a $1 Billion
investment, and a (4KM2):
areas (2KM2): Roads, Pavements, Sewers, Pipes, Electrical, Lights &
CCTV = $45 Million
(1KM2): Plants, Soil, Earthworks, Irrigation, Paths, Tracks, lights,
CCTV = $20 Million
3 a. Commercial
area basic infrastructure (1KM2) Roads, Pavements, Sewers, Pipes, Electrical,
Lights & CCTV = $30 Million
3 b. Alternate
Power = $10 Million
3 c. Equipped
Municipality: Waterworks, Sewage Refinery, Reservoirs, Fire Station,
Police Station, Council Offices, Community Building, Schools, Crèches,
Montessori schools: $45 Million
3 d. Equipped
Campus: Rooms, Labs 5* Hospital, 5* Student & Teacher residences
= $50 Million
3 e. Downtown
& Shopping Mall: Commercial, Retail & Offices = $50 Million
Founding company, sells next plot for $150 Million of which $50 Million
is to bolster Municipal services, $50 to $100 is for luxury “WOW”
items (Stadiums, Ski etc) the balance (up to $50) is to add to the Commercial
district or Campus.
Any overspends in initial infrastructure costs will be recouped from
company profits before POP.
As such we
have universities, schools, hospitals, ecology, green power, jobs, luxury
projects, park land, social security, zero crime tolerance, state of the
art Infrastructures and many attractions. The words: Location, Location,
Location duly considered.
25% Building: (may increase to 40%)
Building Costs vary by over 50% depending in where you are building in
the USA, due to cost of materials labor and in general the cost of living
in the vicinity.
The cost of land verses build cost also varies, however by a far higher
percentage, for instance, in 2011 the average Ohio home costs $150,000
where the land is valued at $8,000 and the construction $195,000. Compare
this to California where the average home costs $434,000, the structure
$142,000 and the land just $238,000 It is also worth nothing that the
same house in California in 2001 cost $751,000 where the land cost $587,000
the structure $163,000.
Please Note, when estimating land purchase prices, figures were based
on 2006 plus prices, as news of a $4Trillion land purchase will push prices
up, quite possibly to double their current worth. This has significant
The figures quoted for structural costs are for building or rebuilding
an individual house, there will be debate of course as to exactly what
percentage building cost is lowered in a half billion dollar project,
strategically monitored by economists, logistical experts and businesses
analysts. Few however would argue that the productivity would increase
by 50% as such if an individual house built by a local builder that build
is worth $100,000 for the same cost in mass, with a building logistics
and analytics team the value would be at least $150,000.
Below we have made a demonstration of a typical plot, total spend $1Billion
25% university, 25% infrastructure, 30% building allowance and 20% land.
The land price is based on a beautiful ranch land in California with mountain
views. Where the company purchased 32 KM2 of which it is building its
development on 4KM2 the other 7 plots to be sold to later projects. As
the land came in at 20% of budget, the building allowance is 30%, so $300,000,000
however as we are assuming, the cost of construction on mass is 50% more
productive than a single property, we have raised the build value to $450
Each plot is desired to house +/- 2000 citizens, in the USA the average
house hold’s 2.6 people, as such we are limiting houses to 770,
we are splitting these houses into 2 groups with a leafy, luxurious 512
Acre estate, 500 houses are for sale as normal, 270 are only for sale
to EEE workers at the University, Hospitals or on the Construction sites,
such houses will become a part of a long term contract, as such they will
only provide residual income yearly.
Currently the average California home’s land value is 20% more than
its build, for now we have just used an even measure, and will discuss
the land value merits later.
Here are the first 500 houses, including a description, their size and
the quantity of each house type
a good starting block valuation for an off plan development, with the
cheapest house just above the Californian average.
Considering our Location, Location, Location directive, the schools, hospitals,
universities, and many other luxuries and “WOW” items still
to be added, just above average sounds perfectly reasonable. Also consider
the land price should have been 20% more, and if escalated back to the
2006 California house land ratio of 280% under normal economic conditions,
the value of homes should go up by 140%
Now the community houses
the income, and spread over 16 to 24 years, however these houses will
be tied to works contracts: E.G we have a university, and we are attracting
those that could not usually afford the tuition fees. It takes about 7
years to train a doctor, who will usually go on to earn between $200,000
and 400,000 a year. Without EEE and the education the doctor would never
be, but expecting loyalty on asking said doctor to work for a more reasonable
salary will lead to disappointment. Peg said doctor to the house and a
16 year contract, where if they leave they lose their house, will see
salary costs halved, as such savings over $2 million can be made for essentially
selling a house at cost price and providing education.
Another example would be construction workers, who average $26,000 a year;
we offer a 20 year contract at that rate plus inflation, plus increases
for new skills acquired. $10,000 a year however goes to pay for Villa#1,
without interest. Our construction workers work about 30 hours in the
field and 15 in the universities, studying and working on the building
economics. A construction worker, working on a site, will be as useful
as a logistical mathematician in a think tank, about how to improve the
performance of that site.
Over the years, the Construction worker improves his skill sets, but salary
goes up half pro rata to what it would, however considering over the 20
years he or even she has spent the equivalent of 10 years at university,
said worker will no doubt finish with a degree and owning his/her own
house. Chances are after 10 years or less, they will be offered alternate
employment, maybe even as a banker, if that is their untapped potential.
Construction workers may move from EEE village to village, even work abroad
following the sun. Having a construction worker motivated in this way,
will make for a far better atmosphere and work ethic on the sites. Besides
construction workers there will be many unskilled jobs suitable for women,
who can follow the same path.
As for the construction companies, they will of
course be EEE and a part of the development they are building, the average
house gets built at a 20% mark up, but many firms try for 40%. In EEE
20% will be the maximum margin, with a 5% contingency. However a 10% bonus
will be given if a house sells for 110% of its baseline valuation. Further
a sliding scale on higher prices, and a 5% residual on resale if over
purchase price. This all adds up to between 30% to 40% or more. As such
with a $16 Trillion initial investment, all companies are guaranteed to
make about pro rata $6 trillion in profit from their building partners
alone, (more on this later). Of course, such motivation makes the entire
team from company to university to individual laborers very conscious
of the need for excellence.
Added to the income made from the houses, will be the income made from
selling Office, commercial and retail space, paid for out of the infrastructure
budget, along with rent for the campus residences and profit made from
luxury infrastructure projects.
All in all, initially at recession rates there is over $1, Billion in
Real Estate at off plan prices, plus 7 more 4KM2 plots to sell.
This is of course just one scenario, there will be many other designs,
the bottom line is simple, if you spend 75% of a budget directly on a
building project and use the other 25% to make sure it’s done financially
efficiently and providing labor, you will make a profit, otherwise others
would not build developments.
Add our story, our aid to the economy and the citizens of the USA in general
and we have an exceptionally branded development, as such it will make
more than usual developments.
Further add a return to normal economic conditions and estimates of 100%
profit are reasonable, as such for the investors $1Billion, they get back
$1Billion, plus they have the extra land.
When we come to States such as Ohio and Iowa, a different model will have
to be used, as land value and property prices are substantially lower.
Cities in these states are of course essential, possibly more essential
than the richer states, in terms of urban development and Medicare/aide/welfare.
One idea is to make plot sizes bigger, 32KM2 with initially 256KM2 of
land purchased, with a more long term view of a rebalance in desirability
due to EEE as such eventually the land purchase will be become a substantial
make a presumption, that EEE and the network would be more warmly accepted
in these states, as such with a willing populous of 11,500,000 in Ohio
and 3,000,000 in Iowa we could see these two states as centers of EEE
in the future, possibly with many “Cities of Science” they
could become, centers of global innovation. As for the next 1000 years
land is essentially free.
This could follow across all the light Green states as marked above, as
geographically they have as much to offer as other states, particularly
Ohio with its strategic placement in the North east and large coastal
As for the architecture and city planning for all
EEE territories, we present S-World Virtual World & Operating System.
was envisaged in 2000, by 2002 it had developed into the world’s
first “Flash” virtual tour, a year later it was offered a
dedicated digital TV channel. However without a connection to a Global
Trade Network it could not make money, so the project was shelved.
9 years later, the basic concept is much the same, display the world over
the internet and on TV in beautiful intriguing manor, whilst introducing
products for people to buy. The financial opportunities and popularization
techniques however have evolved.
The single most significant popularization technique is that we can all
“Teleport to GPS”, within a social networking environment,
one has the ability to jump (teleport) across the globe to wherever their
friends may be. If they were on a yacht in St Tropez at the touch of a
button, one could find yourself on a very realistic 3D representation
of the yacht, placed next to the avatar of your friend. From here you
can look around the yacht or go for a walk around St Tropez harbor, the
only difference being the shops which are operated by S-World business
partners. (“EEE” businesses). In the larger “American
Butterfly” presentation an example of how one such shop or business
can grow to a billion dollar industry via affiliate marketing is presented.
Shopping aside, the travel and real estate possibilities are endless,
instead of looking at a handful of carefully chosen photographs displayed
on a standard website, S-World presents a complete walkthrough, show such
details as the view from every window. The presentation will further become
a portfolio for the properties with detailed media, films, interviews
and guest comments. In the not too distant future the majority of travel
options will be chosen via S-World and the majority of real estate will
however has a more immediate task: Initially its primary is rendering
the developments. Before a brick is laid, the entire city, town or district
will be available to be seen in a beautiful 3D representation in exceptional
First comes the city design and infrastructure, not only created to provide
the aesthetics, but further as a map from which the universities building
logistics and economics departments can start to optimize. S-World will
be open source; quite possibly assimilated to the easy rendering game
“The Simms” as such the planners alongside their own visions
will be presented with hundreds of templates, from which they can refine
to a handful to send to the companies, for their comments and amendments.
Next comes the residential areas, whether houses are sold on, given to
executives, swopped for properties in other territories or rented, often
an individual house design will be chosen and amended to the new owners
particular tastes. As the engineering plans will be made at the university
it opens up house template designs not just to exceptional architects
but to graphic designers, artists, gamers with artistic flair or the man
or the woman in the street . If it’s engendered correctly and looks
good, does it really matter who made the plans.
As such the purchaser will have tens of thousands of house designs available
to them; all will value ratios for resale, all of which can be easily
modified by the purchaser, if one wishes to remove a wall, it is highlighted
and deleted and the build cost amended, if one wants a different swimming
pool, a selection of hundreds are available. If one wished, one could
design the entire house, villa or mansion from scratch.
Not only does this give the purchaser, his or her perfect house type,
it makes it fun, it engages the client.
TV is designed to be the public face of EEE (Ecological Experience Economy).
Film and media companies are desired to set up studios within the towns
and cities, the studios and editing suites paid for via the infrastructure
budget. Such companies will often form parts of companies as loss leaders,
(they are not required to make a profit). Besides such company’s
usual offerings companies will make TV films and series about what is
going on and the vision of the future we wish to achieve.
Product placement is a far more effective adverting tool than simply paying
for commercial space, further having an abundance of material produced
by companies that are not required to make profit, allows for a large
bouquet of channels that can be aired for free on by the associated S-World
media companies. Indeed many programs will only be screened on associated
S-World media companies, as such if one wished to watch the latest shows,
one needs to sign up to an s-world media company.
More exciting is the inevitable combination of TV’s and computers,
some in 3D. All such systems will need an operating system, considering
the 3D nature of S-World business network, the same technology can be
used to create an interactive operating system connected to all networks,
home shopping, every TV channel on the planet, facebook, Google and all
the other functions a computer has, presented in a simple way that can
be controlled via a remote.
It is S-World’s intention to create a total monopoly on computerized
TV’s, not one offering, many, Apple, Windows are desired as core
EEE partners and will of course have their own idea’s, so long as
they incorporate the S-World virtual world, and offer screen services
from EEE media partners. In the Far East I’m sure there will be
separate companies joining in the operating systems race, again so long
as they use the S-World services all are welcome.
A monopoly of the media is of course a bad thing; S-World is not monopolizing
the media, just the delivery method.
Town & City Locations
It is not
our right to dictate in any way, where developments should go, rather
offer advice, even then at this stage there are many variables to consider,
as such our advice is to be tacken with a lot of leeway for change. There
are however both practical and economic factors to consider, fortunately
both of which seem to point in much the same direction.
First the basics, “American Butterfly” was based on the Greek
“New Sparta” model which is one gigantic new city, at an investment
cost of $1,024 Trillion, containing 16 separate “sub cities”
with four 16km2 towns, with additional parkland.
The USA model is to create the equivalent of 16 such cities all be it
largely separated into individual parts. For the “Global Trade Network”
and business advisory service to be most effective and grow quickly, an
“EEE” presence is desired within 30 Km’s of any USA
Economically this is by far the most effective strategy, each presence
will provide schooling and hospital care for the community at large, employment
will be created in all areas, all struggling businesses across the USA
will have assistance and be nursed back to health, and all other businesses
will have support and the opportunity to immerse them within the network.
This method is also a fairer method, not simply picking prime affluent
locations, a complete unbiased regeneration of all counties in the USA.
It further makes logistical sense as finding smaller pieces of land is
easier than larger. Smaller development spread around the country will
not over saturate the market for building supplies and labor. Further
it will not over saturate the market of new available housing, which would
lower the desirability as supply would out strip demand.
The below spreadsheet highlights on possible split of EEE cities, the
$1B Plots will usually be 4KM2 with the company purchasing a further 7
such plots, not necessarily adjacent to each other.
5,887 “places” in the USA, However the larger towns and Cities
will not be fully connected, around New York for instance there isn’t
enough land, as such if one wished a Category 3 City of 128 plots, and
they would have to be split, into many smaller plots circling the city.
As such we are looking at closer to 8,000 “places’ roughly
equal to 2.5 per county, of more importance is no house, town, farm or
city will be further than 20 Miles from an EEE district, hospital, school
or university, and in reverse no businesses will be more than 20 miles
from a “GTN” (businessbook) team.
Next we see how a $4Billion investment block may
be split, this relates to a corporate company or large business.
We will work in units of $125 Million, and use the category numbers as
illustrated in the spreadsheet above. We have simplified the workings
so each billion buys 1KM2 as mentioned earlier this could in reality equal
4KM2 or more.
Here we see
spread across the USA, you will notice yellow GTN village is only a one
eighth full, within the midterm strategy however it is only a 1/32 full,
as over time it is desired to expand. The initial 1KM2 signifies the initial
$16 trillion round; before we address this however let us look at the
other companies that are desired to join.
corporate investor is joined by a second in a complimentary field, wherever
possible one will be a technology company. The primary functions of the
first two companies are to asses and recruit local companies and individuals
into the collective. This can be considered a hearts and minds exercise.
Companies recruited will of course be first to be networked and where
needed advised of threats and opportunities.
Opportunities arise in many forms, for the developers, the construction
contract, for all the opportunity to set up offices and shops in the new
village, they will after all have received real estate and many will consider
shop or office space as opposed to property.
This initial round may take two years it may take two months, the categories
far from set in stone.
Phase 2, 3 and 4
most notable aspects of phase 2, 3 & 4 are “Incorporated Companies”,
“New Ventures” and POP companies.
Incorporated companies, are either local companies that are troubled and
assisted, for such assistance, they need to become incorporated and follow
the POP profit limit. Once they have reached their target profit cap (filled
there “bucket”). This is exchanged for land, from which point
onwards they act in the same manner as companies that made an initial
investment. The same principal applies for local companies that are successful,
but cannot afford the initial investment. In both cases, like all EEE
companies it is in everyone’s best interest to assist the companies
where ever possible and advice from the universities is offered.
“New Ventures” works in the same way as above, however in
this instance companies are started from scratch
“POP” companies, local international and USA based, simply
indicated a company has reached its POP limit, filled its “bucket”
and decided upon expansion to invest into this particular “EEE”
Please note: considering alongside the new “EEE” town, comes
hospitals, schools, universities, business assistance, social security
and in general a nice place to visit, the local community will warm to
its presence, as such the entire local business community could assimilate
within a few years.
Further: The businesses mode above with the phase one alone coming from
the initial investment, sees expansion 3 time’s if this were the
case across the USA, it would create far more economic benefits.
cities universities will concentrate on teaching the local community how
to assist the local community, learning computer science, networks, economics,
business analysis, nursing, doctoring, and in general whatever the local
communities needs and specializes in.
The larger cities however will be more dedicated to technological and
medical advances; it will be here where the core software and systems
are developed. The more technological superiority and advances in general,
the better our EEE companies and the better for the world.
With the combined infrastructure budgets, “Cities of Science”
will be modern day marvels, offering every attraction and every different
type of experience imaginable, they will become busy tourist attractions,
and will see scientists and academics traveling from City to City across
the world experiencing and living life to its fullest.
of a network city is simple, whether its welcome is not for us to say
A network city could be better named and embassy city, it is linked to
the biggest “City of Science”. Its simple model allocates
2KM2 or 4KM2 to each of the 196 countries, and maybe a few extra for people
without a nation, the Kurdish for instance, such an action could help
stabilize various regions.
Of the 4KM2 one quarter is given to the country to build a lavish embassy,
one quarter is sold to pay for the lavish embassy and infrastructure,
the rest remains as parkland placed around the district and flooded with
trees, as such making all embassy towns self contained.
In an ideal world, all countries would have the same amount of land, so
as to give a balance, however if additional money is needed one can sell
Tax and Jobs
Entrepreneurism is ingrained into the American psyche; the United States
is home to 29.6 million small businesses. By the time they reach retirement
age half all USA Citizens will have been self employed for over a year,
a quarter for over six years. 70% of jobs created over the last decade
were from small businesses. Of the 154.4 million employed individuals
in the US, small businesses are the largest employer representing 53%
of US workers, however just under half of small businesses fail within
Why do nearly half of USA entrepreneurs fail? What impact does this have
on the economy and what can be done about it?
Before we consider this, we need to appreciate that a 50% failure rate
over 5 years in global terms is very good. It effectively indicates that
over half succeed, however for those that did not, it not only indicates
the loss of a business, but often one’s life dream, all their savings,
their kid’s education, in many cases the breakup of their family.
There are many social ill effects of businesses failing.
To make matters worse, the business failing is rarely the fault of the
entrepreneur rather, their advisors, and or lack of advisors.
However before we consider this, let’s consider the impact to the
economy if we took 5 year failure rate down from 50% to 25%.
155 million employed individuals, of whom 77.5 Million started their own
businesses, (50%) 38.75 million of them failed. Cutting that down to 25%
would equate to 19.375 more small businesses. A small business is defined
as having less than 20 employees and more than one, as such if the failure
rate came down from 50% to 25%, there would not be enough workers in the
entire country (including illegal’s) to fill the posts.
How to achieve a 25% reduction in small business failures, and whist S-World
is unreservedly a bipartisan presentation, it’s worth highlighting
that a part of President Obama’s current political manifesto, is
to tackle economy from the bottom up.
Firstly we need to appreciate that the vast majority of the www.S-World.biz
groundwork, including the core software, networking, business advisory
plans and service initiatives originated from small business applications,
at the core of which is the financial model. Of which it took the author
8 years to create the specifications, largely created due to what other
software could not provide.
After spending 8 years $300,000, employing 5 financial managers ending
up with a blank check to one of the world leading accounting companies,
it turned out the software recommended by 80% of accountants that only
cost $100 could not deliver.
Running a small business with a couple of staff is generally an easy task
to administer, a spreadsheet or journal handed to an accountant or book
keeper on a monthly basis adequate. Entrepreneurism however, turning a
small business into larger businesses be it ten, a hundred or a thousand
is where the problems comes in, as invariably the CEO will have to seed
part or all financial control to someone else and hire an accounts company
to oversee the accounts.
This opens up the business to many treats, dishonesty and/or negligence
from the bookkeeper or admin staff member/members and billable hours and
complications from the accounts company. All have heard the adage, “lawyers
are not paid to settle” well the same applies to accountants; they
are not paid to make one’s life easier or make your business more
efficient, often quite the opposite, accountants companies take prisoners.
Accountant’s firm’s primary directive is to charge billable
hours, so when an accountant says “You should use this software”
what they mean is “If you use this software, you will need to pay
us a lot of money to interpret the data for you”. If you ask “Can
it calculate my businesses debt/profit balance”, if they say “yes”
what they mean is “I have no idea what you are talking about, if
you want something programmed, you should go to a software development
company not an accountant”
Calculating ones debt/profit ratio is essential for both business decisions
and fraud/negligence protection.
Consider this: from Wikipedia US Public Debt.
“The national debt increase during a given year is not the same
as the "total budget" deficit commonly reported, due to a variety
of accounting complexities involved. These differences can make it more
challenging to determine how much the government actually spends relative
to tax revenues. The increase in the national debt during a given year
is a helpful measure to determine this amount.”
Imagine if President Obama had to make decisions on the “Total Budget”
having no idea that the USA was actually losing more money that the accountants
were presenting. It’s exactly the same for any business looking
at monthly profit and loss figures, such figures do not give the complete
picture, business owners need to know the bottom line.
Further if one can calculate the bottom line, one can cross reference
it with monthly reports, if the monthly report shows a gain of $50,000
but the actual net worth dropped by $30,000 you know, someone has either
made a big mistake or worse there is a hand in the cookie jar.
Creating software that accomplishes both monthly bank reconciliations
whist cross referencing to total company worth/debt is at the heart of
the Sienna.Gov financial software. Giving the right information to the
CEO on a daily basis, on his phone, laptop or iPad essential, if the company
is making profit, he can do what he does best, if not he will have to
look at the finances.
A double check method (overall profit/loss VS monthly balance sheets)
as presented above is an excellent way to avoid fraud and negligence,
however linking the software directly to the bank near alleviates fraud
and negligence in its entirety and will save businesses owners money on
bookkeepers and financial staff. Further making it audit to government
standard alleviates the need for accountants and auditors. Including the
financial efficiencies gained and the financial staff money saved, businesses
could easily find themselves 50% better off. And that’s 50% more
to be spent on business, industry and strength.
Unlike current financial software, that seems to be deliberately complicated
to make accounts companies necessary, the specifications of the Sienna.Gov
software are to make the software for 12 year olds and above, it’s
not rocket science ins and outs and a nicely presented overview, with
about 10,000 different variations to cater for every conceivable business
type and size. Add to that the support crew of tens of millions working
from the universities happy to come on site to advise any business owners
plus the software being free and Sienna.Gov offers the complete financial
The software will also contain every conceivable bell and whistle available,
marketing & branding tools, psychology tests for interviewees and
continual monitoring of staff, and many video clips of business strategies.
It will of course link directly into the “Global Trade Network”
as such ordering or selling goods becomes cheaper and easier.
All these other benefits aside the real advantage, of the software is
its capacity to think independently and advise. This is not accomplished
by a miracle chip akin to Skynet, rather the business advisory groups
across the USA and in time the world, constantly analysing data, answer
the call of any that ask.
Combine this with the PQS (Predictive Quantum Software) and opportunities
and threats will be presented to all business types, If one owns a chain
of Chinese Restaurants, at the touch of a button, one can see exactly
what demand there is in any part of the country, staff can be interviewed
before even setting foot in the Area and an assessment team will help
advise of feasibility and maximum profitability between various sites.
If you start with a $4Trillion budget and millions upon millions of staff,
one can accomplish most anything, so long as you know what it is you wish
We could literally write a hundred thousand pages on how S-World and EEE
will assist small businesses, as that is exactly what S-World and EEE
was designed to, the larger economic plans are just an off shoot. However
for now, there is more to read, so please trust us when we say any small
businesses that use the software and advisory panel will be highly unlikely
to fail and highly likely to grow into a substantial work provider and
tax revenue earner.
Our first consideration is basic human physiology: People want what they
can’t have, as such the leaders of businesses want what they can’t
have, our primary instincts to gather and store food for survival dates
back to our primitive ape descendents. As such we need to limit the share
options available, thus creating desire and demand; in the same way we
make the real estate desirable so shall we make the investment desirable.
The first point to note is that this recession and debt crisis, it not
caused by a lack of money in the world, it is caused by the destabilization
of the West due to spiraling debt. As such countries are no longer considered
a safe investment and many of their banks are painted with the same brush.
It is not the case that there is no money rather no attractive safe investments.
As such, there is no better time, to offer the world a good investment,
and remember what is being offered. At first a real estate venture that
even the most skeptical of financial analysts will verify as solid, add
the future of global technology, trade and networks, all wrapped up in
a branding and PR initiative of such magnitude, the very inclusion of
a company in the first round will in most or all cases see their share
Indeed one EEE initiative is to ask the brokers and stock investors and
the public at large to reward first phase investors by purchasing their
shares, as not only have they invested wisely, they have made a significant
ecological, scientific and humanitarian contribution.
Where ever possible we wish local investment from as many companies as
possible, limiting shares to the smallest units possible. This however
takes immense organization. As such we suggest making the phase 25% ($4
trillion) available to corporate and big businesses, where after it will
be their charge to evaluate and assess the best partners, overseen by
the universities, and to a certain degree the US congress.
As for a timeframe, the basic logistics of building the infrastructure,
campus and basic facilities will in many cases take a year. This however
does not mean we cannot start business from day one. The corporate firms
already have operations centres, staff, management and a board of directors.
Big business and the corporations lucky enough to be included in the first
phase have a lot of decisions to make:
to position their bases (parameters will be set to create an even distribution),
industries to choose: S-World, already presents business plans for a
cross section of business types, travel, construction, fashion, realty,
banking, drinks, energy, networking, software, social networking and
first day a think tank of tens of thousands of the world’s finest
minds, will be gathered to look at all business types, analyzing, strengths,
weaknesses, opportunities & threats whist considering the networks,
systems, pr benefits, investment returns, and the flow of money throughout
the network. Where ever possible we shall request Universities and other
higher education establishments to adapt their curriculum to study and
advance the EEE model.
partners to choose
to best plan their cities
process is going on, the technology companies will be looking at creating
the software and networks, the big four are desired to concentrate on
their strengths: Microsoft working on the financial and business aspects,
facebook the networks, IMB software and systems to run the cities &
Google the work on the virtual world and “per human experience”
Software of course will need to be created as a single unit, seamlessly
and intrinsically connected. Further it is desired not just to include
the “Big Four” but all technology with operation centers in
the USA, as illustrated in the shares breakup of the smaller territories.
The reason for this as the first order of business for all territories
is to network, install and adapt the software into local businesses, as
such from the start we will need people with experience in the field to
start this process and teach new recruits from the local communities.
With these considerations no more than $4 Trillion is needed in the first
phase, further only it would be impossible to spend more than $2 Trillion
and hard to spend more than one. As such, companies can make payments
over a year and $2Trillion can go to the USA gov for the Land (if they
Trillion US Dollars)
First round: $4,096,000,000,000
from targeted partners.
There is no better way to create desirability for investment than make
investment via invitation only. In the vast majority of cases USA owned
companies are preferred, as this will see more brand love and appreciation
from the USA public.
We have a number of essential industry categories.
Leading & Strategic USA Technology Companies
we see a possible split for the first set of options which total $1,024
trillion, one sixteenth of the total investment required. If companies
can afford the options of their own back, then they can pay direct.
If not they can negotiate deals with banks and financial institutions.
We have previously shown, that at least one expansion is inevitable
and as such the real estate alone is worth double the investment,
with a high possibility of being three, four or even five times.
split would be Real Estate 50/50, dividends and shares 75/25 the technology
companies having the greater share.
from the banks directly is not desired, unless in terms of currently
unavailable securities to be liquidated.
the 16 companies that are chosen for the first round effectively become
the board of directors for technical operations.
up to $ 1,024 Trillion
USA based technology & research companies
are over 95,000 technology companies in the USA, we do not have figures
for other research companies, and so we will estimate 150,000 in total
as such if each raised $7,000,000 this phase will be oversubscribed.
We do need to consider, as merciless as it sounds, that any technology
company not privy to the networks and research will have a limited
principal applies to phase2 as phase one, a split deal with financial
institutions is permitted.
allocations will be guaranteed at a figure close to $7Million over
subscriptions welcome, serviced by pro rata allocations of the unsold
up to $ 1,024 Trillion
Brands and the Media: Pr is essential as such one need to
include media and news companies, further sports franchises gain the
popular vote as will individual celebrities.
up to $512 Billion:
Pharmaceutical companies (USA): Due to the intentions to create free
pharmaceuticals for the world these are the most vulnerable companies,
and in many ways the most useful as they have patents on drugs and
vaccines that we desire. Pharmaceuticals are not always the main income
source for drug companies, Johnson and Johnson for instance, makes
only a third of its income from pharmaceuticals and with 5 of its
7 best selling drugs due to lose their patents within two years, will
be open to the idea. With free technology, networks and much cooperation
pharmaceutical companies can excel in other industries, especially
if they have made patents freely available and as such are benefiting
the masses, they will be loved and whatever industries they apply
themselves to will have a branding advantage over others. Further
the parent companies brand love in other departments will increase
up to $ 256 Billion
Energy, Gas etc (Global): With the intention not only to
create alternate energy sources for EEE towns, cities and suburbs
and districts, encouragement for EEE companies to invest in alternate
energy projects for the USA in general, the promotion of alternate
energy cars and the suggestion to make fuel cars pay a tax to drive
in EEE cities with a view to a complete ban. “Give Half Back”
returning money to expand existing EEE energy sources into the wider
community and the hope the US citizens in general will pay a little
more for green energy in the same way they pay more for free range
chickens and eggs. It will be only a matter of time before the USA
will drastically cut its oil, coal and gas consumption.
measures will most likely be the most popular of all EEE initiatives,
and for that matter the most needed, if we wish to give our children
and grandchildren the gift of flight and travel oil needs to be conserved.
The planet needs to have balance, and whist the science that created
this economic solution rarely mentioned its vision was generated and
made possible by nature itself.
and energy companies do not need to suffer, it will take a handful
of years to really see a difference, during which time they can invest
their profits in alternate energy and create a long term future for
themselves, as currently their lifespan is as long as their supplies
last, in many cases less than 20 years. The sun will create fuel for
millions of years, and with hundreds of millions of people assisting
the development of solar and other alternate energy projects, power
output will soon rise and as such those that start now, will be those
that benefit it the future.
to create non energy businesses up to $ 256 Billion
(Options to create other alternate energy projects $ Unlimited)
is no reason to restrict the creation of alternate energy supplies;
this has the effect of not blocking investment opportunities for companies
that could destabilize regions. An initiate is set forward in the
PQS, USA profit creation section, that these companies receive tax
breaks in exchange for working without profit until the USA debt is
It is essential to have industry leader such as Coca Cola, McDonalds,
Wall Mart etc, for both the network and their experience.
up to $ 256 Billion
Plane and Transport companies:
The future of the automobile industry lies in cars that do not require
fossil fuels, the research that goes into improving power efficiency
will in a handful of years see powerful electric cars. EEE in general
and the PR machine will reverse the stigma of owning such cars seeing
electric cars glamorized and fuel cars seen in a low light.
Advise will be taken on the necessary infrastructure needed to power
the desire to not only tax fuel cars within EEE cities but to in time
to ban them entirely, few would argue that the future of the automobile
industry will be in alternate power.
the mass infrastructure, other transportation companies, such as trains
will see tremendous orders, from municipalities and city planners.
up to $ 256 Billion
and financial institutions
The primary jobs of banks is to wisely and safely invest their customers
money, with the real estate possibilities alone suggest a 50% to 200%
yield within a matter of years, add the technology, networks, pr and
the opportunities to create new businesses with a 25% per year dividend
yield, and we will see every bank on the planet will wish to invest
software to work optimally, we need to be hardwired into as many banks
and finical institutions as possible. However only one bank is needed,
all twenty million or so EEE employees will be paid only to EEE banks,
as such most will change banks. Add to this trillions being spent
of software and networks to improve their efficiency, and an unlimited
budget for networking and improving each bank followed by a large
monitoring contingent, banks and financial institutions will make
for willing partners.
4 US banks alone are holding $7.7 trillion, as such considering the
first year will be largely spent on logistics and systems there is
an argument that one should work as technology partners with these
implementing such a measure with the intent of only paying salaries
to EEE banks causes its own problems; this can be solved by the other
banks being allowed to act as partners for EEE companies from giants
like facebook to sole traders starting off. Not by making loans, rather
making a split of the company, facebook’s bargaining power could
see a 50/50 or even a 75/25, where the bank pays the investment but
owns just 25% of the real estate and shares.
is still a good investment as facebook will quickly reach POP and
make the 25% dividends which is split in 4 would give the bank a 6,25%
in annual returns, that grows as more companies are created via POP,
plus of course they have ¼ of the real estate. In the case
of a new sole trader or struggling new business, the ration could
turn around, between 50/50 and 25/75, depending on the situation and
the two parties negotiating power.
There is no problem with banks making money from EEE, the more money
they have the more they can lend and the stronger they are.
up to $256 Billion:
businesses and Medium Enterprises: Collectively these companies
generate more revenue that the big corporations, the systems will
need to be tailored to these companies as such they are essential
partners. However with millions of such companies in the USA giving
each a stake is not practical for the first wave of investment.
important to have a cross section of industries spread evenly across
the USA; as such we consider 256 industry types, in each state, creating
an average investment of 38.5 Million, split pro rata to the size
of the company.
up to $256 Billion:
This is phase
one complete, $4,096 Trillion. The latter 5 categories are extremely restricted
in terms of availability, preferred partners assessed and picked, as such
demand is high
demand extremely high however is the price being fixed, usually in share
floatation’s, the higher the demand the higher the share price until
a balance of supply and demand is created. In the case of EEE this does
not apply, the price is fixed, as such demand is extremely high, and as
such one can pick and choose partners.
As the technology companies come on board, the directors and shareholders
of other companies will believe without a shadow of a doubt that the future
of technology and networks lies within EEE, this in turn will make the
remaining technology companies see their future within EEE and it will
quite possibly the most important factor is “the will of the people”
With an end to the recession around the corner, tens of millions of jobs
created, many thousands of hospitals, schools and universities planned,
and a green future the will of the people will be immense, and as most
of the shareholders in the companies are “the people” there
is no conceivable way the first phase of investment will be undersubscribed.
All it takes
is four men, President Obama, Senator Romney, Mark Zuckerberg and Bill
Gates, all of whom are good men who have nothing to lose and much to gain
including a place in the history of mankind that will be talked about
for thousands maybe millions of years.
The second and third rounds will consist of many different business types,
and include individual investors. Again we wish to create desirability,
this is achieved by the share options and dividends remaining at the fixed
rate of $1Billion per plot and 25% dividends. Where after we reserve the
right to increase the entry fee and lower the dividends.
phase of investment concentrates on building up the networks and improving
businesses near to wherever the new EEE developments are based. With an
estimated 11,874 cities towns, suburbs and districts, averaging three
per county every business and citizen will be close enough to be individually
If we look
at the $1 Billion plots, $250 Million will have already been invested,
below, in no particular order is a breakdown of 20 different business
types that will given the opportunity to invest, or incorporate. When
we divide the next investment phase ($250M) between the different sectors
we see a maximum investment of $12,500,000 per sector. A figure which
any one company or individual in any sector could easily raise themselves.
As such like the first round, the second round will be vastly oversubscribed.
the local businesses and individuals need to be incentivized to adopt
the software, join the network and listen to the business advisory board.
The previously mentioned possibility of future developments costing more
and paying less dividends may well be postponed until year 3. However
after the first block is allocated, the additional applicants will be
assigned a separate, usually adjacent plot.
financial institutions are again invited to partner with local businesses
that cannot raise the funds.
Three: National Investors & POP (year
the third round we see a similar process to round 2, all be it instead
of an even split across sectors, investors will be chosen on their merits.
By this time the PQS (predictive Quantum Software) will be in its first
phase of operation, as such combined with the universities think tanks,
the viability of business success and the value added to the community
will be available for all to see. Whist it is of paramount importance
to offer local businesses the first bite of the cherry, businesses across
the USA working together as a unit, will see great progression.
of investment options will go to POP companies both USA based and international.
These are the founding or send phase companies that have been successful,
made their profit caps, filled their buckets and expanded.
USA will be the first country to adopt EEE, Europe and the rest of the
world will not be far behind, the economic model is universal, the more
“Science Cities” the more communal advances and global humanities
will be created, the more technology companies adding to the software,
the stronger it becomes, the more companies on the network the more powerful
As such by
the third year a considerable amount of new EEE companies will have created
new feeder companies, most of which will consider the USA the best option
for their next venture. This will drive innovation and progress within
companies across the globe, creating healthy competition, made stronger
by the shared technology.
to say, with all the companies in the USA now freely allowed to invest,
and by so doing see priority to their companies in terms of networking,
and technological benefits, this round will be oversubscribed, however
unlike round 2, there will be no options for new plots, not designated
in the original “American Butterfly”
International Investors & POP (year
Obama and Senator Romney, advocate open trade with Global markets is in
the best interest of American economics. We need to respect their opinions
as they will be the work of the finest economic minds in the USA. And
for both Republicans and Democrats to agree shows this plan is no doubt
in the best interest of the USA.
As such, the final round will be exclusive to international companies,
largely or exclusively relying on the PQS to advise which companies will
be of most benefit.
we sit now, we don’t believe we could find a single economist or
business advisor who would suggest the $16,024 Trillion will not be made
within four years.
However due to Local businesses and Energy companies having the ability
to invest in additional projects, the total investment figure will be
higher, possibly far higher.
Once we have completed phase four, and the network has been strategically
developed for maximum benefit to the countries’ economies. Either
another $4,096 Trillion investment cap will be set, to keep up exclusivity
or it will be an open market, by this time the PQS will be in a position
to give solid advice.
It would however be desired for individuals around the world to invest
privately, with 7 Billion people in the world an investment of $585 each,
will fill a $4,096 block. Such an investment could be facilitated by the
countries governments, buying the shares for their citizens in a split
fashion as previously suggested for the banks
the problems in 2000 to 2012?
Economic Analysis 2000 – 2012 (OBM Figures used for total debt,
main source Wikipedia)
When President Bush was elected in 2000 the USA was $5,629
Trillion Dollars in Debt, which equated to 57.6% of GDP.
GDP stands for Gross Domestic Product, put simply “what it sells”
or in business terms “turnover”. A Countries GDP can be considered
as its “performance” as such regardless of inflation, it is
a relatively good yard stick to measure against a countries debt.
If at the end of a year a countries debt to GDP ratio increases, it’s
been a bad year, and on the other hand if it decreases it’s been
a good year. It should be noted that economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth
Rogoff calculated that on average countries with debt above 90 percent
of GDP grow 1.3 % slower than others.
In 2000 the USA debt increased by only $18 Billion and
by 2001 the GDP ratio was down to 56.6%. 2000 was a very good year, possibly
the best financial year in American history. In hindsight, it would have
made sense to simply “leave things as they were”, the old
adage “if it’s not broke, why try to fix it” would have
been well considered.
However no doubt spurred by electoral promises & the opportunity of
turning the USA into profit, President Bush put into motion what is now
known to be “The Bush Tax Cuts”. On the 7th June 2001 the
Bush Administration introduced a tax aimed at economic growth which projected
a $1.2288 profit over the next three years. This is what is known as “fiscal
policy” the idea being that lower taxes equates to harder work,
therefore more profit and a higher GDP and as such an overall higher tax
However no one could have predicted what happened next and its effect
on the USA economy as on September the eleventh 2001, a terrorist attack
on the two world trade towers in New York, destabilized the USA and Global
economies. Not to be deterred however President Bush introduced another
Tax cut in 2003 this time aimed at Jobs & Growth.
In 2005 a review showed that the projected $1.2288 profit
had in effect made a loss of $581 Billion, with 22% attributed to 9/11
related spending. However the actual losses were worse as between 2002
and end 2005 the USA went a further $2,126 Trillion in debt, an average
of 30 times more than 2000. The GDP ratio now stood at 63.6%,
with total debt rising to $7,905 Trillion.
2006 & 2007 saw $539 and
$500 Billion increases with the GDP up to 64.8%, at this point
questions were being asked, most notably Ben Bernanke the Chairman of
the Federal Reserve was asked: How urgently should the U.S. put plans
in place to address its budget challenges? His reply: "The longer
we wait, the more severe, the more draconian, the more difficult the objectives
are going to be. I think the right time to start was about 10 years ago.
Total debt rose to $8,951 Trillion.
2008 brought the banking crisis which saw a $1018
Trillion loss as tax receipts were significantly lower than expected.
This increased the total debt to $9,986 Trillion: 69.6%
One trouble that followed was for the governments to consider the global
financial crisis in the same manner as all that had come before, “a
simple rebalance that would pass in a year or two”. However this
was not the case, the global crisis was due to first world debt, caused
by social security, welfare and medical payments to an increasingly large
and aging population, further hampered by pharmaceutical bills becoming
increasingly expensive. For example, the number of workers per retiree
was 5.1 in 1960; this declined to 3.0 in 2010 and is projected to decline
to 2.2 by 2030
Usual methods of fiscal policy (adjusting taxes) and monitory policy (spending
on infrastructure to create jobs) did not apply as a solution, rather
a quick fix. The problem is created by debt, and as such creating more
debt cannot be the answer. Either severe austerity (saving/cuts) or an
economic plan such as “American Butterfly” which requires
no government borrowing yet increases both tax revenue and creates jobs,
is needed. However as there was no “American Butterfly” on
the table and severe austerity was an election looser, the status quo
and the respective governments borrowed more money to try to spend themselves
out of danger. We also saw some very poor estimating by bean counters
2009 having lost significant income due to low tax receipts
the year before the government increased their expected tax income to
$2.7Billion, only to receive $2.1Billion. An unavoidable $400 billion
expected loss was already forecast. However spending went $400 Billion
over budget on this forecast. After which a further $470 Billion was spent
on “Other” totaling a loss of $1,887 Trillion,
with total USA debt at $11,898 Trillion, GDP: 84.4%.
In relative terms, from 2003-2007 the government spent roughly $1.20 for
each $1.00 it collected in taxes. This increased to $1.40 in FY2008 and
$1.90 in FY2009.
2010: The Obama Administration.
An election promise is an election promise and as such a 58.6% increase
to welfare was enacted, alongside a host of other increases across the
board totaling 20%, tax yields increases by one percent. All common sense
would suggest that debt would have increased by more than the $1,887 created
the year before, However it did not as 2010 debt was down to $1,654
In real terms however 2010 was another disastrous year as total debt rose
to $13,529 Trillion, GDP: 93.4%. Now
at the point where economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff calculated
the USA will now grow 1.3 % slower than countries with lower debts.
In June 2010 in the Wall Street Journal, former chairman of the Federal
Reserve, Alan Greenspan noted that "Only politically toxic
cuts or rationing of medical care, a marked rise in the eligible
age for health and retirement benefits, or significant inflation, can
close the deficit and if significant reforms are not undertaken, benefits
under entitlement programs will exceed government income by over $40 trillion”.
The “politically toxic” comment was probably directed at the
“Bush Tax Cuts” that were due to end at the end of 2010
In August 2010, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that extending
the tax cuts for the 2011-2020 time periods would add $3.3 trillion to
the national debt, comprising $2.65 trillion in foregone tax revenue plus
another $0.66 trillion for interest and debt service costs.
The Bush Tax Cuts, have been hotly debated for a decade, all be it not
specifically from a democratic perspective. “The Heritage Foundation”
alleges that the Bush tax cuts led to the rich shouldering more of the
income tax burden than the poor. While the “Centre on Budget and
Policy Priorities” concluded that the tax cuts have the largest
benefits, by far on the highest income households.
As such with no political party wishing to stick their necks out on the
30th November the tax cuts were extended for a further 2 years
The 2011 budget indicated that: jobs, health care, clean
energy, education, and infrastructure will be priorities; it further mentions
investments in science and technology. These are of course the major components
of “American Butterfly” The federal budget was increased from
$3.6 to $3.8 Trillion, while total taxes and other revenues rose from
$2,217 billion to $2,364 billion.
Figures are scarce on actual spending, total yearly loss and GDP ratio
However as of today 1st February 2012 the USA debt clock states that the
USA is $15.3 Trillion in debt. Up $1,772 trillion from the end of 2010,
(It appears OBM figures are calculated yearly not as per budget months)
As such, in 2011 the USA debt increased by $1,635
Based on the 2010 U.S. budget, total national debt will nearly double
in dollar terms between 2008 and 2015 and will grow to nearly 100% of
GDP However, ahead of predictions, total national debt reached 100% by
the third quarter of 2011
In May 2011
Economist Paul Krugman wrote: "What happened to the budget surplus
the federal government had in 2000? The answer is three main things. First,
there were the Bush tax cuts, which added roughly $2 trillion to the national
debt over the last decade. Second, there were the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan,
which added an additional $1.1 trillion or so. And third was the Great
Recession, which led both to a collapse in revenue and to a sharp rise
in spending on unemployment insurance and other safety-net programs.”
Military spending: The military budget of the United States during FY
2011 was approximately $740 billion in expenses for the Department of
Defense (DoD), $141 billion for veteran expenses, and $48 billion in expenses
for the Department of Homeland Security, for a total of $929 billion.
The 2012 budget predicts an increase in tax from $2,364
Trillion to $2.627 Trillion, the interesting point to note is that for
the first time in recent history, the federal budget has gone down, from
$3.8 Trillion to $3.7 Trillion.
Actual figures for the 2012 budget will be available after September 2012
The “Office of Management and Budget” forecasts that, by the
end of fiscal year 2012, gross federal debt will total $16.3 trillion.
In July 2010 The CBO (Congressional Budget Office) reported several types
of risk factors
- A growing
portion of savings would go towards purchases of government debt, rather
than investments in productive capital goods such as factories and computers,
leading to lower output and incomes than would otherwise occur;
- If higher marginal tax rates were used to pay rising interest costs,
savings would be reduced and work would be discouraged;
- Rising interest costs would force reductions in important government
- Restrictions to the ability of policymakers to use fiscal policy to
respond to economic challenges; and
- An increased risk of a sudden fiscal crisis, in which investors demand
higher interest rates.
In June 2011
the CBO offered a solution called the “Extended Baseline Scenario”
that aimed to reduce the yearly deficit to 1% of GDP by 2021 (about $140
Billion a year)
Eliminate all the Bush Tax Cuts in 2012; reduce Medicare rebates to doctors,
try to increase tax revenues from the average 18% GDP to 23% GDP. Lower
the cost of defense and many domestic programs, to the lowest levels of
GDP since before World War 2 and expect interest payments (now $164 Billion)
to increase from one to 4% of GDP.
In other words, raise taxes, cut spending and hope for an economic miracle,
which fortunately is available via “American Butterfly”
The CBO also offered the “Alternative Fiscal Scenario” which
considers keeping the Bush Tax Cuts, and expecting tax revenues to stay
closer to their historical average, however this scenario sees Public
debt at 190% by 2035 (Note Public debt is in effect only 70% of total
debt) as such Total debt would be closer to 300% GDP.
In June 2011 the CBO reported: The explosive path of federal debt under
the alternative fiscal scenario underscores the need for large and rapid
policy changes to put the nation on a sustainable fiscal course."
Then in September 2011: "The nation cannot continue to sustain the
spending programs and policies of the past with the tax revenues it has
been accustomed to paying. Citizens will either have to pay more for their
government, accept less in government services and benefits, or both.
Given the aging of the population and rising costs for health care, attaining
a sustainable federal budget will require the United States to deviate
from the policies of the past 40 years in at least one of the following
federal revenues significantly above their average share of GDP;
- Make major changes to the sorts of benefits provided for Americans
when they become older; or
- Substantially reduce the role of the rest of the federal government
relative to the size of the economy.
2007 comment: "The longer we wait, the more severe, the more draconian,
the more difficult the objectives are going to be” starts to ring
economic growth and employment: A fast-growing economy offers the win-win
outcome, of a larger proverbial economic pie to divide, with higher
employment and tax revenues, lower safety net spending and a lower debt-to-GDP
- Make equitable trade-offs: For example, taking away benefits from
those in or near retirement may be considered inequitable, while phasing
out retirement benefits for younger workers may be considered less so.
- Keep short- and long-term issues in perspective: Healthcare cost inflation
and an aging population are the primary long-term deficit drivers. Unemployment
and various tax and spending policy choices are the primary short-term
deficit drivers. Measures to encourage economic growth today can be
implemented along with other measures to reduce future deficits
- Invest productively: Some spending can be categorized as investments
that lower future deficits. For example, if infrastructure, education
or R&D investments could make U.S. workers and products more competitive
or generate a revenue stream, these could reduce future deficits. Examples
might include installing windows that reduce energy costs, toll roads
and bridges, or power plants
Obama established a budget reform commission, the National Commission
on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, which released a draft report in
December 2010. It included various tax and spend adjustments to bring
long-run government tax revenue and spending into line at approximately
21% of GDP, with $4 trillion debt avoidance over 10 years.
- President Obama announced a 10-year (2012–2021) plan in September
2011 called: "Living within Our Means and investing in the Future”:
The President’s Plan for Economic Growth and Deficit Reduction."
The plan included tax increases on the wealthy, along with cuts in future
spending on defense and Medicare. Social Security was excluded from
the plan. The plan included a net debt avoidance of $3.2 trillion over
10 years. If the Budget Control Act of 2011 is included, this adds another
$1.2 trillion in deficit reduction for a total of $4.4 trillion.
- The House of Representatives Committee on the Budget, chaired by Rep.
Paul Ryan (R), released The Path to Prosperity: Restoring America's
Promise. The Path focuses on tax reform (lowering income tax rates and
reducing tax expenditures or loopholes); spending cuts and controls;
and redesign of the Medicare and Medicaid programs. It does not propose
significant changes to Social Security.
- The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) proposed "The People's
Budget" in April 2011, which it claimed would balance the budget
by 2021 while maintaining debt as a % GDP under 65%. It proposed reversing
most of the Bush tax cuts; higher income tax rates on the wealthy and
restoring the estate tax, investing in a jobs program, and reducing
- The Bipartisan Policy Centre sponsored a Debt Reduction Task Force,
co-chaired by Pete V. Domenici and Alice M. Rivlin. This panel created
a report called "Restoring America's Future," which was published
in November 2010. The plan claimed to stabilize the debt to GDP ratio
at 60%, with up to $6 trillion in debt avoidance over the 2011-2020
periods. Specific plan elements included defense and non-defense spending
freezes for 4-5 years, income tax reform, elimination of tax expenditures,
and a national sales tax or value-added tax (VAT).
At the end of the 20th century USA borrowing was at an all time low, with
national debt at $5,629 Trillion Dollars in Debt, which
equated to 57.6% of GDP. Since that time debt has risen
to $15.3 Trillion, over 100% of GDP.
This is largely due to a combination of “The Bush Tax Cuts”,
The Obama Spending increases, wars and lower tax receipts due to the financial
crisis, amplified by an increasing cost in social security, welfare and
medical payments to an increasing large and aging population, further
hampered by pharmaceutical bills becoming increasingly expensive.
The overwhelming consensus amongst economists and budgetary organizations
is that “the Bush Tax Cuts” should not be extended past 2012,
however certain individuals like anti tax activist Grover Norquist are
making the sensible option increasingly difficult.
All agree that the cost of wars needs to be reduced, many suggest a dramatic
Without exception, it is agreed that the biggest long term threat is Medicaid
& Medicare; the numbers on persons enrolled in the latter expected
to increase from 47 Million to 80 Million by 2030. However it is more
the rapidly rising costs of medical bills that see the predicted rise
from 5.3% GDP to 10% in 2035 and 19% in 2082. By which time if paid in
full, all tax revenue will be spent on Medicaid and Medicare; as such
there would be no money for any other services, not even a salary for
In 2007 Ben Bernanke the Chairman of the Federal Reserve was asked: How
urgently should the U.S. put plans in place to address its budget challenges?
His reply: "The longer we wait, the more severe, the more draconian,
the more difficult the objectives are going to be. I think the right time
to start was about 10 years ago.
In June 2010 in the Wall Street Journal, former chairman of the Federal
Reserve, Alan Greenspan noted that "Only politically toxic
cuts or rationing of medical care, a marked rise in the eligible
age for health and retirement benefits, or significant inflation, can
close the deficit and if significant reforms are not undertaken, benefits
under entitlement programs will exceed government income by over $40 trillion”.
As such, no government, republican or democrat can implement the measures
needed to reduce the yearly deficit to a manageable level without committing
parliamentary suicide. As such, the essential tough decisions that are
essential will not be made, the economists and the budget makers will
be ignored, the USA will continue to lose over $1 Trillion a year, and
within a year their credit rating will drop from its AAA rating. At which
point borrowing will cost more.
If the global economy miraculously reverts to pre 2007 levels, interest
rates will rise, and within a handful of years, the USA will be spending
close to $1 Trillion a year on interest payments and according to statistics
will grow slower than other economies due to its debt to GDP ratio being
By the end of this decade, there will not be enough money to pay for most
Medicare and Social Security obligations, this will cause deep distress
to as Medicare and Social Security are in effect social insurance programs
into which US Citizens have contributed all their working lives.
At this point, the United States of America will be a very different land
indeed, the effect on the Global economy, devastating, the effect to world
peace and stability unimaginable.
It is extremely lucky, that there is a Plan B.
Using a baseline
figure of current losses at $1,635 Trillion, starting at February 2012’s
$15,300 Trillion total debt, American Butterfly conservatively estimates,
the USA will be in profit by 2015 and in the black (all debts paid) by
This allows for the “Bush Tax Cuts” and all other current
tax rebates to remain in place in their entirety and does not touch Social
Security, despite adding in that area.
So far nine areas of savings have been presented, no doubt, once the CBO,
BEA and other institutions have added to the model, further savings and
revenue streams will be made.
The only contentious issue is “8: Savings Wars” however, figures
presented are simply in line with those currently on the table. Should
these cuts not be made, it will have a negligible effect on the solution.
It is however highly likely, that as soon as the USA is making profit,
more tax cuts will be offered to the public, American Butterfly wished
to suggest, that future tax cuts be applied in the main, to companies
that are using the Sianna.Gov software to calculate and pay tax. Implemented
in the correct way, one could see a different attitude to tax, where one
is proud to be in a higher tax bracket, and is boastful of their rebate,
nationalist entrepreneurial capitalism at its finest.
Note the word’s “American Butterfly conservatively
estimates” the word conservatively is used as the above figures
are largely based on the initial investment round and companies created
from said investment, it does not address the true ambitions which are
to expand exponentially, remember the land procurement stage aims to buy
7 times more land than is used in the initial $16 Trillion phase.
Further: After 2019 no increases are recorded, and whilst further savings
are not necessary, increases across all tax creating sectors are expected.
Let’s analyze the 9 profit centers.
1. Tax not collected $350 Billion;
This is based on research gathered by the IRS in 2007, the Sienna.Gov
software if free, will save businesses money and time, whist offering
increased efficiency and easy to read bottom line essential figures. The
network will decrease costs and increase marketing opportunities, the
advisory service will be of further benefit. If the IRS calculates that
$350 Billion was missing in 2007 whilst $2.57 Trillion was collected,
this indicates that less that 86% of taxes are paid.
In most cases we expect that tax is not avoided rather not paid in full,
by maybe a quarter of the yield, so 5% to 10% maximum, as such the savings
on the system outweigh the extra tax that would be paid.
One does not need to be a part of the EEE business structure to use the
software, and to use the network one needs to use the software, as such
we believe it’s reasonable to assume that the software runs most
businesses by 2018.
The IRS of course, will have less work to do, as such, they will concentrate
fully on businesses not using the software, further consider the PQS (Predictive
Quantum Software) that will be measuring the flow of money throughout
the USA, and tax evasion will be incredibly difficult.
Further consider, future tax cuts being offered only to those using the
software, and the public goodwill for companies that use the software
as they have new hospitals and schools and the USA is no longer in financial
danger, and a general air of suspicion will be cast on those not using
Further consider a referendum for USA citizens regarding making the software
mandatory, and lastly consider the concern of businesses that if a referendum
is called and they are called to task, the software will easily pick up
Lastly consider a tax amnesty for all who start to use the software.
All in all, we believe a complete end to tax fraud and evasion in the
USA, we expect in reality there will be more than $350 Billion extra collected.
2: Usual Business Restored
The totality of the “American Butterfly” initiative dictates
that as soon as the first $4Trillion is raised GDP will sky rocket, and
at the very least pre 2007 conditions will be restored. Further add the
$4 Trillion in land acquisitions, effect of raising USA house prices back
and past their 2007 levels.
Further consider the “American Butterfly” system being applied
3. Tax on New EEE Companies: This is money made from New EEE companies;
it’s possible this will rise to 4 or so trillion a year, cut back
4. Tax on Small Businesses: The intention is to make 75% of small businesses
successful over 5 years not 50%, as such the figures presented are very
5. Tax on medium, large and corporations increased due to the systems,
networks and software: I know little about large companies so this is
an educated guess, we need however to include all small businesses that
succeed to medium and large enterprises so the figures are probably light.
6. Saving on Medicare: with 10,000 soon 20,000 new hospitals (all 5* experiences)
and free medication a $450 saving of over $1T is more than reasonable.
7. With the USA having no unemployment and a need for about 20 Million
more workers, plus retirees welcomed back to the work force a $325B saving
is more than reasonable
8. In line with current thinking and strategies, add to this “The
Spartan Theory” which basically bribes warring nations to lay down
all weapons for Cities and relief, seeing regimes in tribal areas given
a split rule ½ normal government half EEE government. (It’s
complicated, but simple)
9. Improved government systems, i.e. removing humans from accounting and